Accueil

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 1 utilisateur et 208 invités en ligne.

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« Janvier 2009  
Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V General

Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par DauntlessDave le Lun, 2007-08-27 09:23 Space Empires V General

I only tested this a low tech levels, but in 1 v 1 combat, a frigate with the same weapons set will beat a similarly designed destroyer. I put 3 beams, 1 seeker and 1 pd on both ships, the destroyer was able to carry significanly more armor. Even so, the defensive bonus of the frigate made the destroyer miss often enough that the frigate was typically able to do enough extra damage to offset the destroyers bigger hull and extra armor. In 5 trials the frigate won every time.

‹ Ergie's map creator SE:V v1.58 History ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.
Image de Captain Kwok
Mod Designer

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Captain Kwok le Lun, 2007-08-27 09:34

But what would happen if you replaced some of the destroyer's armor with another weapon?

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Kilson le Lun, 2007-08-27 10:28

Well for only 100kt, thats not that much size difference in SEV. Are you putting combat sensors on both ships?

Given that the frigate gets a 10% higher doge bonus than the destroyer.
The extra weapons that a destroyer can carry should more than offset the bonus on the frigate.

try putting an extra weapon on the Destroyer see if that give the destroyer the win.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par DauntlessDave le Lun, 2007-08-27 10:29

Good question, I dont recall there being room for one, But I may be wrong. Either way, I think people jsut assume that bigger is better and it may be that this is not always true.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de BlueTemplar

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par BlueTemplar le Lun, 2007-08-27 10:36

And tweaking strategies. And using combat sensors.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par DauntlessDave le Lun, 2007-08-27 10:43

It came about just after I developed destroyers and I built the best one I could, both ships had shields and Combat sensors I think. I wanted to see how much better it was than my latest frigate and I was just a bit suprised that it was worse. I'll try ditcheing the extra armor and repalcing it with a weapon and I'll check in again.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Thy Reaper
Mod Designer

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Thy Reaper le Lun, 2007-08-27 12:03

You have to get level 5 frigates before you get level 1 destroyers, so if you didn't also get level 5 destroyers it's not a fair test.

-----
Space for rent - please contact owner

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Lord Shleepy le Lun, 2007-08-27 12:48

Thy Reaper wrote:
You have to get level 5 frigates before you get level 1 destroyers, so if you didn't also get level 5 destroyers it's not a fair test.

Not really. If you spend research points on something it should yield you a better product - not a worse one. The benefit might be insignificant at low levels but it should at least be a step sideways...instead of a step backwards.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de BlueTemplar

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par BlueTemplar le Lun, 2007-08-27 12:55

That's not true. In stock you can choose between researching more levels of frigates, or start researching destroyers. If lvl1 destroyers were better, or at least as good than lvl5 frigates, I can't see why you would choose to continue researching frigates (which is a dead-end), when it's obviously better to research destroyers!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de RogerN

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par RogerN le Lun, 2007-08-27 13:03

The stock game doesn't provide many benefits to larger ships, with the exception of weapon mounts. Destroyers are particularly lousy due to crew requirements. I would ignore the destroyer class and skip straight to light cruisers.

In order to properly simulate the benefits of large ships you need to take an approach similar to that of the Gritty Galaxy mod. Thanks to leaky directional armor, larger ships are better equipped to make use of heavy armor plating which can deflect small arms fire. I plan to use a very similar approach in an upcoming project.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par DauntlessDave le Lun, 2007-08-27 15:20

That was what I noticed, RogerN, that you needed extra crew mods that ate up space, take that away and you'd have room for enough weapons to make the DD better than the FF.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Dansherrill le Lun, 2007-08-27 20:45

Get master computers and that space for bridge,crew and life support goes away.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de RogerN

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par RogerN le Lun, 2007-08-27 21:55

Dansherrill wrote:
Get master computers and that space for bridge,crew and life support goes away.

Unfortunately the master computer costs more than the rest of the entire destroyer. The master computer is not cost-efficient to put on a destroyer, at least not in stock.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par rahlubenru le Mar, 2007-08-28 05:14

I think destroyers may make better seeker vessels than frigates, since with those the aim is not to get in weapons range but for direct fire the frigate is better

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de BlueTemplar

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par BlueTemplar le Mar, 2007-08-28 07:50

But frigates turn faster...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par tarancalimon le Mar, 2007-08-28 08:01

As far as my little experience extends, a level 5 Frigate is better than a level 1 Destroyer in combat. But, in the end, when both reach level 10, the Destroyer overcome the Frigate. This is why I do not use the first 2 - 3 level of a given ship, continuing to upgrade the design of the previous class. But, for a level 1 Destroyer there is a good use: very fast colony ship. It can host the maximum number of engines (2 more than a colony ship) and a number of supplies that allows it to reach even systems very far from the ones of yours (on the contrary, if you value less the time needed to reach a planet, colony ship are better, since have more space for supplies).

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par jdunson le Mer, 2007-08-29 14:55

One of the other things to consider is upgrades. The minimum ship size (in stock) that can use a Large Mount is 400kt. That's a level 7 FF, a level 3 DD, and already at level 1 for CL and up. Sitting at 5 FF, 1 DD, if you have an existing ship base it may be a more immediate improvement in combat punch to go for 7 FF and upgrade existing ships than to change tracks, go for 3 DD, and build a bunch of destroyers from scratch. The max size of a destroyer is 575 to a frigate's 475, which is an improvement but not a whole lot.

The minimum size for Heavy Mount is 800k. Not even a fully upgraded light cruiser (675) can hit this; the first ship that can manage is the level 6 cruiser. Note that frigates through light cruisers go up by 25kt per level, while the cruiser goes up by 50kt per level, making level improvements a better buy. In stock, the cruiser is also the largest unrestricted ship that can have 12 engines.

Depending on how one's empire and neighbors are doing, a logical upgrade plan might be 7 FF, minimum 5 DD (which does hit the 3 needed for mount), minimum 5 CL, and then push CC all the way to 10. In many of my games the fully-upgraded cruiser at 1,000kt is as large as I really need for mobile units, given the loss of both tactical and strategic mobility of anything larger. You need to get battleships up to level 8 before they can use the Massive ship mount, and I'm rarely convinced that's worth it.

On the other hand, the Massive base mount increases to-hit and range as well as damage efficiency, and that can be crucially important. A Space Station can't hit that, but even the first level of Starbase can; if you're planning on needing serious fixed defenses it's well worth shooting for Starbase.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Alpedar le Lun, 2007-09-10 05:08

I noticed, that generaly (in any game) it is good to give same ammount of critical resource in defense and offense for units that hits and get hit (so it is only for slugging matches, not for parthian shot ships).
This is of course only "starting point" of design, and works only if choices are balanced (1kt kill everything weapon would beat this approach).

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par goodship01 le Lun, 2007-10-01 21:36

By the time you field a few Destroyers you should be able to field at least 10-15 Frigates, all of them were either at the frontlines or in yards for upgrades. And those ship are crucial in defending territories because they have more space and that their supplies are larger with a better weapon outfit, the Destoryers at first wouldn't have enough space to field the equipment so i don't use them.

Enemy destroyers gets chewed up early on (especially for me as i am a shield and phased beam FOCUS player). Of course, i couldn't argue that the Destoryer could take the next level of mount but will that be able to make it destroy a frigate is still out of the question.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Pit Fiend le Mar, 2007-10-02 02:38

Isn't researching DD or FF to lvl 10 a waste of research points? Normally when i hit lvl 5 i swap to the new design and stop resaerching the previous designs.

Best regards.
Pit Fiend

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par rahlubenru le Mer, 2007-10-03 01:20

getting frigates to level 10 is a good idea because they're cheap and have the built in defense bonus so make good fodder ships if you need them, and have other uses

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par gigawing2 le Jeu, 2007-10-04 02:33

I have no problem with destroyers, they usually have 1000 armor/hull vs 500 for frigates. I know there is some overlap, but so what. i'd rather get the extra hull space and add weapons, than rely on the defense bonus.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Pit Fiend le Jeu, 2007-10-04 03:27

I think for the points to get Lvl 10 DDs i can easily swap at Lvl 5 to Light Cruiser and get Lvl 2-3 in this field.

Lvl 3 Light Cruiser should beat Lvl 10 DD, isn't it?

Hope for some experience,
Pit Fiend

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par gigawing2 le Sam, 2007-10-06 21:53

>Lvl 3 Light Cruiser should beat Lvl 10 DD, isn't it?

Sure. I usually switch, when the new ship type has 50-100kt more space than the old one.

But the original poster was saying that destroyers are useless, because frigates can always beat them. I'll have to try it myself, because the AI does not design frigates very well.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par DauntlessDave le Lun, 2007-10-08 19:37

Whoa there, I never said DDs were useless because FFs always beat them! Read the OP again, I said I did one test a low tech, and that the results were "food for thought". This has turned into a pretty informative thread, for me at least, so it has been food for thought.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Destroyers vs Frigates....food for thought

Soumis par Eratosthenes le Mer, 2007-10-10 08:14

One thing to remember about any Frigate vs. Destroyer matchup: that defensive bonus only applies to Direct Fire weapons in stock. Seekers always hit if they catch you.

The larger hull sizes may be easier to hit with DF weapons, but also allow you to put more PD on them, defending against seeker weapons.

So if an opponent is going full DF, a smaller ship size is likely better. If they use a lot of torpedoes and missiles, then the smaller hulls sizes will actually be a liability, unless they can outrun/outrange the target.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Politic Game Crash
  • Research By Percentage SUCKS
  • Space Empires V 1.77
  • Space Empires V
  • Babylon 5 Space Empires V mod?

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • Crimson Concept Mod, 4.01, has been released.
  • Getting past the interface.
  • Weapon Modding: Lessons Learned
  • All human players eliminated from the Galaxy!
  • Congrats to Capt Kwok
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.