Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 1 utilisateur et 145 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • Santiago

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« Juillet 2008  
Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V General

Recently got SE V, confused by several things.

Soumis par rditto48801 le Mer, 2007-07-18 19:57 Space Empires V General

I recently got SE:V retail version and have been playing using the Sergetti empire's ship style (the blue sort of crystalline looking ships), and when I finally got access to the Starbase, I noticed it was puny slot wise.

Puny as in the much larger Sergetti Starbase has equal armor and inner hull slots as the smaller Sergetti Space Station, but 42 less outer hull slots!
What's up with that?
Now I can't get the thought of clown cars out of my head...

Things of lesser concern/importance.

The Contra-Terrane engines. IIRC, that is another name for Anti-Gravity, but the description mentions anti-matter. Makes me tempted to do a little name swapping and description tweaking...

Weapon Mounts, for ships, even massives don't get range boost, yet it seems even the basic large mount for everything else does get a range boost? Large gun on satellite outranging massive gun on a Battleship? Seems silly to me.

Are satellites useless in stopping ships?
I got a few on a warp point in a nebula system (6x sats with 2x DU cannons, 2x with 1 missile, 1 with sensors), but enemy ships keep using the warp point to get into one of my systems without ever attacking the satellites on the warp point on the other side. In sector view, the sats are in a ring around the warp point.

On a final note, I am new to this forum, but not to Space Empires in general, although SE:V is the first of the games I have actually been able to get the full/retail version. I have played SE IV demo to death in the past, plus a few times through SE V demo and once through the Star Fury demo.

‹ Shield imploder What ‘s up with the militia? SE5 1.44 BM 1.08 ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.
Mod Designer

Re: Recently got SE V, confused by several things.

Soumis par Fyron le Mer, 2007-07-18 23:26

If satellites had shorter range than battleships, they would be entirely useless. The range boost for immobile defensive units makes sense.


SpaceEmpires.net | Space Empires Wiki

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de BlueTemplar

Re: Recently got SE V, confused by several things.

Soumis par BlueTemplar le Jeu, 2007-07-19 03:56

Maybe your sats are on a "cloacking" warp point?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Recently got SE V, confused by several things.

Soumis par CyclopsSlayer le Jeu, 2007-07-19 19:16

rditto48801 wrote:
The Contra-Terrane engines. IIRC, that is another name for Anti-Gravity, but the description mentions anti-matter. Makes me tempted to do a little name swapping and description tweaking...
Contra-Terrane, or CT (SeeTee), is a somewhat out of fashion term for anti-matter. The term was popular many years ago in such places as Tom Corbet of the Space Patrol, or Jack Williamson's SeeTee Ship / SeeTee Shock.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de BlueTemplar

Re: Recently got SE V, confused by several things.

Soumis par BlueTemplar le Jeu, 2007-07-19 19:39

BTW what are the Jacketed Photon Engines supposed to be?

Ion and Antimatter are well known traditionnal 3rd Newtonian Law engines, Quantum is a theoretical "anti-gravity"-FTL warp engine (so it shouldn't exist in SEV), but I have never heard of Jacketed Photon engines...

Also, I might understand there are no "Chemical" engines, but where are the Fission and Fusion engines!? AFAIK they are better than Ion engines.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Re: Recently got SE V, confused by several things.

Soumis par Fyron le Jeu, 2007-07-19 21:57

They are supposed to be blissful technobabble. Don't try to make sense of the tech in SE, or your head will explode. Trust me, I've seen it happen!


SpaceEmpires.net | Space Empires Wiki

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • I am so impressed!
  • Space Empires V 1.74
  • Neutral pack 1.10 released, now adds three neutral races.
  • Stuipd Question
  • Research By Percentage SUCKS

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS?
  • Quick Question about the Abilities Added To Parent When In Cargo
  • Decoy Suggestion
  • components
  • Is making a Federation impossible?
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.