Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 1 utilisateur et 162 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • solanrix

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« October 2008  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires IV » Space Empires IV FAQs

Satellites - maintenance cost.

Soumis par tanczacykot le Lun, 2007-07-09 13:43 Space Empires IV FAQs

Maintenance cost of satellites is zero. Do this makes them to powerfull? Some planets without shipyard may build satellites non-stop. Mines BTW too.
Yes, I am noob, and english is not my primary language.

How to remove grids? ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Re: Satellites - maintenance cost.

Soumis par capnq le Mar, 2007-07-10 04:42

In my opinion, no, satellites are not overpowered for a couple reasons:

1) You have no control over their position during combat, they clump in a single sector, and they can't move. They are just as likely to be out of range on the opposite side of the planet as they are to be facing an incoming attacker.

2) There are limits to how many units can be launched in the same sector, and how many total units can be launched throughout your whole empire. Both of these limits can be changed in Settings.txt , but I've never seen that make a big difference in how they're used.

I think fighters might be slightly stronger than satellites, since they're mobile and can be kept on the planet until needed, but that's balanced against them being smaller (with shorter weapons range and less damage).

"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it /is/ a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Satellites - maintenance cost.

Soumis par ernesto79 le Mar, 2007-07-10 08:44

i tend to agree with capnq

you can also build fighters on planets without shipyards

early game satellites are a really good way to strengthen your defense on the long run i dont really use them...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Satellites - maintenance cost.

Soumis par tanczacykot le Mer, 2007-07-11 05:55

Thanks. I didn't know about this limit.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Satellites - maintenance cost.

Soumis par SolusLupus le Jeu, 2008-02-28 23:25

I tend to use lots of satellites, but not so much in orbit around planets but as blockades. I build some ships the deploy satellites and lay them, about 20 at a jump point. They will ALWAYS be right next the point in the tactical combat, and if they don't destroy an attacker they weaken them. Paired with a ship or two, it is a very good defense. Better than mines because they only need relaying if they get destroyed. Mines I do find useful around a planet though.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Satellites - maintenance cost.

Soumis par Vince278 le Ven, 2008-02-29 19:35

Fighters work better in almost every role satellites can be used for (except as sensor buoys). Smiling

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Sword_Acolyte

Re: Satellites - maintenance cost.

Soumis par Sword_Acolyte le Mer, 2008-10-08 12:12

How does this have anything to do with maintenance cost?

I like sats around warp points, a mega pain to lay, but they can last all game. Esp once you get a shield on them, and then put a repair bay ship in the hex with them.
Let's go

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Satellites - maintenance cost.

Soumis par capnq le Ven, 2008-10-10 07:15

Sword_Acolyte wrote:
How does this have anything to do with maintenance cost?
With no maintenance cost, it's easier to deploy enough of them to hit the unit limits.

-----
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it /is/ a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Research By Percentage SUCKS
  • No Point Defence in Technology in Balance mod
  • Space Empires V 1.74
  • Space Dock suggestion
  • Robo Miners - Mining asteriods ?

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • SE5 v1.35 scrapping facilities
  • Balance Mod
  • Not producing intelligence points
  • Colony vessels not automatically loading population with Balance Mod
  • combat questions
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.