Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 2 utilisateurs et 127 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • BlueTemplar
  • MondoMage

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« Décembre 2008  
Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V FAQs

Ramming 101

Soumis par Sir Spiff le Lun, 2007-05-21 07:51 Space Empires V FAQs

I tried my hand at focusing on ramming ships the other day, moving much of my attention from weapons to armor, bigger ships, and better engines. It's a lot of fun to see enemies line up, just to have my ships plow straight through 'em all. However, I'd like to know some more about ramming, namely almost everything.

Apparently, the smaller is supposed to be destroyed. Is that always the case? Can a heavily armored level 2 destroyer win against a heavily armored level 3 destroyer?

I know armor is a huge help when ramming, but what about shields? Do they offer similar benefits? And if you use crystaline armor when ramming, would that recharge your shields?

Do solar sails give a mobility boost in battle, as well?

Can very large ships, like Dreadnoughts and Baseships, win when ramming Space Stations?

‹ Newbie Questions One per system... ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par UnderLord le Lun, 2007-05-21 20:45

Better idea, get drones...out fit them with war heads...build lots....and send them after the enemy....thats a good time....they kamikaze against the enemy ships and BAM 1-2 drones can take out a nicely armored enemy distroyer or even cruiser if your tech level is high enough.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de ColonialAdmiral
Mod Designer

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par ColonialAdmiral le Lun, 2007-05-21 22:20

Drones are expensive...
But anyways, solar sails don't affect movement in combat. Only outside. Laughing out loud

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par UnderLord le Lun, 2007-05-21 22:26

Quote:
Drones are expensive...

True, but don't they count as "units"? hehehehe so a game with 200 ship maximum, get some drones wipe em out...done.....

But i usually use drones for scouting and such =)

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Sir Spiff le Mar, 2007-05-22 06:53

Drones, aside from annoying AI issues, die. A lot. A ship, on the other hand, can ram and destroy several ships and live to be repaired. Also, ramming with a ship is a whole lot more fun than ramming with an overpriced super missile.

My only use for drones is in remote planet killing. Send drones with cloaking devices into enemy territory and watch the fun as you decloak enough firepower to destroy the world right on top of homeworld! MWAHAHAHAHA!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Psieye

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Psieye le Mar, 2007-05-22 07:16

Likely Mods have some say in this. Ramming is dictated by your total structure points I think, hence why Armour is such a huge factor. Besides that, you're likely the pioneer for learning the subtler mechanics of ramming. Experiment.

---Sig---
Playing Touhou games (Go here if interested . No, nobody else is that good/insane as that replay). No rush for SE V bug fixing.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Sir Spiff le Mar, 2007-05-22 11:00

Actually doing and learning stuff myself? An intriguing concept. Well, I guess there's a reason for having the simulator.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par UnderLord le Mar, 2007-05-22 17:41

Sir Spiff wrote:
Actually doing and learning stuff myself? An intriguing concept. Well, I guess there's a reason for having the simulator.

ROFL

Yes expensive, but useful...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Sir Spiff le Ven, 2007-05-25 12:15

I did some fiddling. The neighbors didn't like the racket, so I experimented in the simulator.

It's all about total structure. I had a heavily armored frigate win against an almost empty space station. It doesn't seem to matter whether the structure comes from armor or cargo bays. Shields seem to count twoards structure just like armor or components. Damage taken also doesn't affect who wins or how much damage you take. Ramming doesn't count as a "hit" with regards to crystaline armor.

Victory and damage in ramming are determined by your total structure versus their total structure, be it from shields, armor, or components. The greater the difference the less damage the victor takes.

Since "size" would be better stated as "resilience," ramming becomes a combined issue of the unit's size and structural density. You want to cram on as much health onto a ramming ship as you possibly can, not only so you can win in ramming, but so you take minimal damage in the process.

Basic armor is by far the densest component in the game, far beyond all the special armors, making it the front runner. A perfect rammer has all the standard armor it can hold. The ideal rammer would thhen have strong shields, because you can only have so much armor, and damage to shields is trivial. Powerful engines are a must in order to actually reach the target. Everything else, like point defense is for addaptation to circumstances, whose necessity depends on what kind of support these ships get. Repair for the armor and resupply for the shields would be essential in the long run, though.

Ramming is a strategy best suited to the close-combat of defending and assaulting warp points, or decloaking in the middle of enemy forces.

Edit: After further use, I say that speed is now the most important element in ramming. It sucks trying to ram someone moving at your pace. Engine destroying weapons are also a huge help.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de an_unoriginal_username

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par an_unoriginal_u... le Ven, 2007-05-25 13:25

I've been thinking, shouldn't the speed of a vehicle also affect the amount of damage done to the target? To me it would make sense that a ship traveling at 13km/s would do more damage than a ship traveling at 1km/s. I'm pretty sure that this could be modded in, but it should have been in the stock game.
-----
an unoriginal signature

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Dvoongar le Ven, 2007-05-25 13:46

Thank you Sir Spiff, for your excellent report. I haven't done anything with ramming yet, but it's now on my list of things to try. A hot warp point will surely be a good place to set up a rambush!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Dvoongar le Ven, 2007-05-25 13:49

Aaaaah! Double posted.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Kingside_Bishop

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Kingside_Bishop le Mar, 2007-06-05 13:49

Dvoongar wrote:
...rambush!
That's my new favorite word.

Anyway, this sounds very cool. I'll have to come up with an empire dedicated to ramming, immediately. This'd be awesome... armor is so cheap, both to build and research. With this kind of an empire, all you'd need is armor and engines, which I always research anyway.

Screw weapons! Full speed ahead!

Rambush!

~ Kingside_Bishop

[/communication]

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Romulus68
Mod Designer

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Romulus68 le Mar, 2007-06-05 14:59

Kingside_Bishop wrote:
Anyway, this sounds very cool. I'll have to come up with an empire dedicated to ramming, immediately. This'd be awesome... armor is so cheap, both to build and research. With this kind of an empire, all you'd need is armor and engines, which I always research anyway.

~ Kingside_Bishop

[/communication]

Warhammer Battlefleet Gothic - The Orks.....they specialize in Ramships and simpily love to fight.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Innuendo le Mar, 2007-06-05 16:49

Good old Orks, they know how to fight don't they. Nun ov deese fancy guns un stuf.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Sir Spiff le Jeu, 2007-06-07 07:48

You still need a serious investment in bigger ships, and engines alone won't cut it; you need engine destroying weapons. You won't need much, but you'll definitely need some. Or tractor beams. Those're fun.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par Fyron le Dim, 2007-06-17 13:43

Damage the ship has already taken doesn't affect ramming damage? Are you sure? That would be a big bug if so. Also, shields on the ramming vessel aren't supposed to count for the damage done to the target (unless Aaron decided to change the physics from SE4); the target's shields are supposed to absorb damage though.


SpaceEmpires.net | Space Empires Wiki

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ramming 101

Soumis par dcarde007 le Dim, 2007-06-17 16:52

What do the settings in settings.txt mean?
Ram Ship Source Modifier Percent := 60
Ram Ship Target Modifier Percent := 100

Both shields should be considered, they should detract from eachother until one gives, then it would detract from the armor then both armor would detract from eachother then internal structure. Speed and Vector should also be taken into consideration, if feasable.

Ramming should destroy the losing ship, take into consideration of the Galaxy Class (Enterprise style from Next Generation) Starship that was destroyed so easily by a single ship which rammed it when the Federation sent an invasion force through the wormhole.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Biggest game problem in the beginning
  • Captain Kwok's balance mod
  • SEV 1.74 misc. Issues and Suggestions
  • Is the Patch Process Dead, and Other Thoughts...
  • I can't see enemy planet in the Transfer Cargo window

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • New Race requested
  • Abilities
  • Turn off combat log? Other ways to speed up TCP/IP?
  • Norak shipset issue
  • Questions about intel and certain components
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.