Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 3 utilisateurs et 122 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • Hearteater
  • Romulus68
  • Fyron

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« May 2008  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V After Action Reports

The extra evil ship design fails its test...

Soumis par Skystrider le Dim, 2006-10-01 00:21 Space Empires V After Action Reports

So my empire just discovered some new weapons, and after making myself a nice solid design, I put it for a test-drive in the simulator.

What's the goal of the ship? To knock out my enemies' weapons and engines, leaving a maintenence-costly broken hull of a ship, that's what! (This tactic owned in SE4!)

But the tachyon cannons and ionic dispersers are all but useless in SE5, because, not only do they no longer penetrate armor, but they can't deal damage to it. I put said ship design against itself in the simulator - all the two ships did was dance around each other until the time expired, because the shots they fired did nothing.

The dispersers/tachyon canons work against un-armored ships, but then I have to reasearch normal weapons to get that far. What's the point of getting the engine-only or weapon-only weapons then? I sure hope this is a bug that will be fixed...

ps - I don't know what these weapons do to sheilds yet, I hadn't gotten the tech.

‹ The Ring of Life Galactic History: Tau Empire ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.
Mod Designer

It does say exactly that in the description

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Dim, 2006-10-01 11:00

The idea I suppose is if you have a BIG ship with a lot of internals. Or something. :/

That's one part of the damage types that sadly can't be modded. I think.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Thy Reaper
Mod Designer

You should be able to give

Soumis par Thy Reaper le Dim, 2006-10-01 13:17

You should be able to give the X-only damage types 100% shield and armor piercing effects, like in SE4. I haven't looked through the damage types that much, but I get the feeling this is very possible.

With all these people, you would expect one of them to carry an iguana around...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Unfortunately not.

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Dim, 2006-10-01 13:27

The X-only damage types use Special Effects.

From the top of the damagetypes.txt file:
1. If there are special effects, execute them. Skip all remaining steps.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Captain Kwok
Mod Designer

They need to skip armor

Soumis par Captain Kwok le Dim, 2006-10-01 16:26

The special types should skip armor by default though - I'll add that to my list for MM.

-----

Space Empires Depot | Space Food Empires!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

They need to be modable. :P

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Dim, 2006-10-01 16:56

It'd be best to have the special effects modable as to whether they skip shield and armor or not, like all the other damage types.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de AngleWyrm

Here's an iguana for

Soumis par AngleWyrm le Dim, 2006-10-01 20:00

Here's an iguana for ya:

Damage Type Name                          := Only Weapons
Description                               := Damage which, once armor and shields are penetrated, only causes internal damage to weapons. 
Picture Number                            := 5
Cannot Penetrate Any Kind Of Shields      := TRUE
Cannot Penetrate Any Kind Of Armor        := TRUE
Number Of Vehicle Types                   := 0
Number of Shield Types                    := 0
Number of Armor Types                     := 0
Internal Damage Percent                   := 100
Facility Damage Percent                   := 100
Population Amount Killed Per Damage Point := 0.25
Crew Amount Killed Per Damage Point       := 0
Is Viral Weapon                           := FALSE
Number Of Special Effects                 := 0
Number Of Requirements                    := 1
Requirements Evaluation Availability      := TRUE
Requirements Evaluation Allows Placement  := TRUE
Requirements Evaluation Allows Usage      := 1
Requirement 1 Description                 := Only destroys components that are weapons. 
Requirement 1 Formula                     := Is_Component_Weapon()
Number Of Abilities                       := 0

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Yes, that's the type

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Dim, 2006-10-01 20:21

And oddly enough it CAN be modded. The way the top of the file reads, modding shouldn't work..but it does, sorta. The cannot penetrate fields are read, and if they are false the weapon skips ALL of that type (you can't make a PPB style weapon damager, in other words).

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Thy Reaper
Mod Designer

That's a weird looking

Soumis par Thy Reaper le Dim, 2006-10-01 20:41

That's a weird looking iguana...

--------
With all these people, you would expect one of them to carry an iguana around...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de dwiebe18
Mod Designer

I want weapons that can

Soumis par dwiebe18 le Mer, 2006-10-04 02:53

I want weapons that can target the self destruct device. Unless there is and I missed it somehow.
______________________________________________________________
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Sometimes I get this urge to conquer large parts of Europe.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Weapon/engine destroying

Soumis par Fishman le Mer, 2006-11-29 23:56

Weapon/engine destroying damage types can be modified to skip armor and shields. At present it is useless, since it would only damage weapons and engines after you have already blown through shields and armor, but then you don't need a special weapon type to cause internal damage!

dwiebe18 wrote:
I want weapons that can target the self destruct device. Unless there is and I missed it somehow.
Targeting the Self-destruct device seems meaningless, since I've captured ships with self-destruct devices all the time. in SEIV, they'd destroy the ship attempting to board, but in SEV, boarding is accomplished via assault shuttle and th boarding ship has plenty of time to escape the blast zone before any hypothetical explosion occurred. A self-destruct device merely allows you to manually destroy the ship in combat, it does not automatically explode and the AI will not explode the ship.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de col.kurtz

Weapon/engine destroying

Soumis par col.kurtz le Jeu, 2006-11-30 04:43

Quote:
Fishman wrote : Weapon/engine destroying damage types can be modified to skip armor and shields. At present it is useless, since it would only damage weapons and engines after you have already blown through shields and armor, but then you don't need a special weapon type to cause internal damage!

I agree, but for balance purpose I guess it would be better if they could just skip armor (not both armor and shields), or maybe these weapons ability to pass thru armor and shields should depend of their tech level.

-------------
Feel lucky earthling ?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

I'm not sure what you're

Soumis par Fishman le Jeu, 2006-11-30 04:48

I'm not sure what you're agreeing or disagreeing with, since I basically only stated that the present weapons were useless without making any statement on the balance merits of anything. It would make more sense if they damaged shields normally and ignored armor, as logically weapons and engines would need to be exposed to the outside or else they'd be unable to function properly.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de col.kurtz

Well, this is more or less

Soumis par col.kurtz le Jeu, 2006-11-30 07:49

Well, this is more or less what I meant.

-------------
Feel lucky earthling ?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Rilbur

Ship Engines

Soumis par Rilbur le Sam, 2006-12-02 11:37

Would someone PLEASE explain to me why engines "have" to be on the outside of the ship? Sure, ROCKETS need to be... but names like anti-matter and quantum leave me thinking they're reactionless drives. I. E. instead of spewing a junkload of stuff out your rearend to move forward, you create movement in some other manner. And said other manner by no means has to require contact with the skin of the ship.

Reaction Drive: Uses physics as we understand it, newtons third law for every reaction yada yada yada.

Reactionless Drive: Cheats and somehow produces movement without shoving stuff outside the hull at high speeds. Advantages are (or should be) obvoius.
_______________________
There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de maran

random thought

Soumis par maran le Dim, 2006-12-03 15:34

Rilbur wrote:
Would someone PLEASE explain to me why engines "have" to be on the outside of the ship? Sure, ROCKETS need to be... but names like anti-matter and quantum leave me thinking they're reactionless drives.

Just a random thought, maybe the energy created for movement still needs to go somewhere and better it be as far away from the ship as possible?

---

Designing an advanced, diplomatic AI + shipset
Consult the great SEV Wiki

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Rilbur

Movement

Soumis par Rilbur le Dim, 2006-12-03 22:31

maran wrote:
Rilbur wrote:
Would someone PLEASE explain to me why engines "have" to be on the outside of the ship? Sure, ROCKETS need to be... but names like anti-matter and quantum leave me thinking they're reactionless drives.

Just a random thought, maybe the energy created for movement still needs to go somewhere and better it be as far away from the ship as possible?

---

Designing an advanced, diplomatic AI + shipset
Consult the great SEV Wiki

Its applied directly to movement Laughing out loud
_______________________
There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Psieye

Getting these weapons to work

Soumis par Psieye le Jeu, 2006-12-07 18:59

I was frustrated when I first came across this problem too. Went to DamageTypes.txt today and changed it to "FALSE" for "cannot penetrate shields/armour". So now they can at least damage shields and armour before only damaging certain components. You could further mod that so that shields and/or armour is completely ignored and damage done straight to internals.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

ugh

Soumis par DimmurWyrd le Sam, 2006-12-09 09:26

Psieye wrote:
I was frustrated when I first came across this problem too. Went to DamageTypes.txt today and changed it to "FALSE" for "cannot penetrate shields/armour". So now they can at least damage shields and armour before only damaging certain components. You could further mod that so that shields and/or armour is completely ignored and damage done straight to internals.

hehe I found that too cheesy in SE:IV myself... massive null space cannons were god weapons hehe... I have 15,000 shields ... well I have 4 massive null space cannons so KABOOM yer toast lol.

Basically I wouldn't mind X destroying weapons being able to bypass armor IF the X item was in the outer hull (and weapons and sensors should be outer hull only) engines might be based on type... ION is definitely reaction driven so outside it goes lol... others who knows. but it would cripple shields even more to make them so useless... however they should definitely take damage from being hit with an X destroyer.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Nullspace Weapons Still Do That

Soumis par Fishman le Mer, 2006-12-13 22:37

DimmurWyrd wrote:
hehe I found that too cheesy in SE:IV myself... massive null space cannons were god weapons hehe... I have 15,000 shields ... well I have 4 massive null space cannons so KABOOM yer toast lol.
Nullspace weapons STILL do that, they completely ignore all shields and armor. It's the engine/weapon destroyers that now DON'T ignore all shields and armor, which makes them quite useless, as you wouldn't NEED weapon/engine destroying weapons if the enemy ship didn't have shields and armor, a NORMAL weapon would do a quite adequate job turning them into vapor. If you deliberately want to leave crippled wrecks, though, try the alloy burner missiles with your weapon/engine destroyers.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Engines

Soumis par someone le Mer, 2007-04-18 09:39

DimmurWyrd wrote:

Quote:
engines might be based on type... ION is definitely reaction driven so outside it goes lol... others who knows.

All engines generate energy: Ion engines are probably either super-chemical or fusion, Contra-terrene ones use matter-anti-matter reaction, Jacketed-photon engines harness photons to move the ship and Quantum engines produce the energy with a quantum singularity. All of these are "rockets" and require a way for the energy to get out, the only way to get around this is coherent brownian motion used in the Heart of Gold in the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. Instead the engines don't all need to be in the outer hull, only the one which lets the ions or particles out and the others being installed in front of it like this:
XX
XX engines in inner hull (will keep ability to move longer when
XX damaged, but vital interiors will be hurt earlier)
XX
II outer hull in the rear of the ship
II

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Nullspace Weapons Still Do That

Soumis par Nevyn le Mer, 2007-04-18 12:38

Null space weapons in V are seekers now, so they can be defended against.

My personal suggestion would be to make the Engine/Weapon destroyers ignore armour, but impact on shields, so that they can be protected against somewhat, but once shields are down(which stop things further away from the hull)

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Aurore

Re: The extra evil ship design fails its test...

Soumis par Aurore le Jeu, 2007-04-19 02:57

I believe they should not ignore shields but should do some damage to them. I also think they should ignore only normal armour, not armour derived from special technologies, such as organic.

Aurore

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: The extra evil ship design fails its test...

Soumis par someone le Dim, 2007-04-22 07:33

If it doesn't pierce org/crys armor then it must at least damage them because this would add another unfair advantage to org empires. As I posted here earlier, engines can't be completely covered by armor and engine-damaging weapons will be targeted to those parts so they should skip armor. Of course there could be a penalty to damage like "does only 50% dam to engines if ship has armor", to simulate the relatively small non-protected areas.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Defence vs. Attack and other Combat related questions...
  • Sphärenwelt
  • Why Retrofit is limited to +50% per order?
  • Babylon 5 Wars SEV Mod Update
  • Balance Mod Neutral Races

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • Who can do it.
  • Remove old CD Key code
  • Changing The Screen Resolution?
  • How does this work?? (Get function)
  • Questions on Lan-play Setup
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.