Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 1 utilisateur et 205 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • bauscho

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« December 2008  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V General

1.33 bug query

Soumis par Incomitatus le Ven, 2007-03-23 17:41 Space Empires V General

Hello,

Is anyone else finding it impossible to make changes to strategies with 1.33? Particularly the 'Retreat Settings', 'Retreat When', 'Damage Amount', and 'Range' settings?

I have so far found myself incapable of changing these settings for new, copied, or existing strategies. The diaglog box to select the changes opens, but when pressing 'OK' to close the box, nothing changes.

My playing style relies heavily on customized strategies for my different ship classes and mission types, so I will be very disappointed if this feature ends up now being broken, especially since part of it ('All weapons gone' damage setting) was supposed to be fixed.

I'm hoping it's just a problem with my install, which is why I'm asking if anyone else is having trouble.

‹ Retail 1.33 Question before purchase New to Space Empires Universe ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.
Image de AgentZero

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par AgentZero le Ven, 2007-03-23 17:56

I just had a fiddle with this and it all works perfectly fine for me.

Suction feet are not to be trifled with!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Incomitatus le Ven, 2007-03-23 18:01

Right. Thanks AgentZero. I'll do a reinstall and see if it clears up, then.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de BlueTemplar

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par BlueTemplar le Ven, 2007-03-23 18:13

I have the same problem... Sad

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de BlueTemplar

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par BlueTemplar le Ven, 2007-03-23 18:24

Another feature/bug : the "Home Planet Different Size" setting now does not affect the player with a 1 planet start. You now always get Small for Bad, Medium for Medium and Large for Good Planet Value.
So the player can't get Tiny and Huge planets to start with anymore.
It also looks like the sizes players get are less spread out...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Singularity

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Singularity le Ven, 2007-03-23 19:53

Was it after a fresh install, or putting 1.33 over 1.25?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de AgentZero

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par AgentZero le Ven, 2007-03-23 19:54

Went back and did some more experimentation, and it looks like I misunderstood the what was being said. I thought when you said "I click OK and nothing changes" you meant the dialogue box wouldn't go away, so that's what I was looking for. After rereading, I understand now you meant that you can't actually change the options, and I have indeed run into this problem as well. Retreat Settings, Retreat When & Target Type Order and Settings all are unchangeable, but Movement Options & Targeting Priority Order do work.

I've sent Aaron a bug report.

Suction feet are not to be trifled with!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Incomitatus le Ven, 2007-03-23 23:05

Thank you Agent Zero. I've also discovered that this bug only seems to affect normal setup games. Quick Start games are NOT affected.

Singularity - Fresh install. I had the 1.25 demo installed concurrently, and thought that there may be some conflict. I've had games that couldn't be installed at the same time as their demos before, so I removed both and reinstalled the full game + patch again. No change.

Edited to add: If any can come up with a quick manual fix, I'd appreciate being let in. I've held off buying SE V until it seemed to be mostly debugged. I suppose not having the ability to fully customize the Strategies is a relatively minor thing, but I got used to it in the 1.25 demo. The stock strategies do ok against the AI, but my cousin and I have been looking forward to a multiplayer showdown. With strategies un-editable, it hardly seems worth it.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de AgentZero

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par AgentZero le Sam, 2007-03-24 00:47

No solution yet... Though I have discovered that manually editing Strategies.txt has absolutely no effect on this whatsoever. I changed all the options for Optimal Firing Range & added a new strategy to the .txt file, and when I started a new test game, Optimal Firing Range still had all it's old settings, and my new strategy was nowhere to be found.
This is most peculiar.

Suction feet are not to be trifled with!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de AgentZero

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par AgentZero le Sam, 2007-03-24 01:22

Incomitatus wrote:
Thank you Agent Zero. I've also discovered that this bug only seems to affect normal setup games. Quick Start games are NOT affected.

Really? That's odd. I just started a new quickstart game to test this out and was unable to edit strategies there either.

Suction feet are not to be trifled with!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par bmaxa le Sam, 2007-03-24 02:16

AgentZero wrote:
No solution yet... Though I have discovered that manually editing Strategies.txt has absolutely no effect on this whatsoever. I changed all the options for Optimal Firing Range & added a new strategy to the .txt file, and when I started a new test game, Optimal Firing Range still had all it's old settings, and my new strategy was nowhere to be found. This is most peculiar.

Suction feet are not to be trifled with!

That is because file used is set in [empire]_ai_main.txt
in empires/[empire] folder.
Actually file used is default_ai_strategies.txt in
empires/default folder.

Greetings, Branimir.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de bheusi

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par bheusi le Sam, 2007-03-24 12:59

I´ve noticed that the "troop design without weapons" problem still occurs, through not as often as before.

What´s really troubling me is that the AI (in stock) is designing crystalinne and organic ships without ANY armor or shields, making them easy pickings. This is nasty... Overall however, the patch is quite an improvement, through it is rare to see an AI fleet with troop transports AND mine sweepers, so it is still quite vulnerable to mines...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de ColonialAdmiral
Mod Designer

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par ColonialAdmiral le Sam, 2007-03-24 13:29

Possible Bug: Playing IRM for 1.33 patch, all ships have the ability to cloak...evan without cloaking components on the ships!!! I still havent tested stock verison....

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par evilginger le Sam, 2007-03-24 13:36

This has been in IRM for a long time it doesn’t actually do any thing unless the ship actually has a cloaking device. I would guess Fallen Haven was trying t o allow ships to go on silent running but found it impossible to implement at the time. I do remember him posting an explanation at some point but cant recall exactly what was said

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de AgentZero

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par AgentZero le Sam, 2007-03-24 15:21

bmaxa wrote:
That is because file used is set in [empire]_ai_main.txt in empires/[empire] folder. Actually file used is default_ai_strategies.txt in empires/default folder.

Greetings, Branimir.

That's even more peculiar then, since the files you refer to are meant to provide the AI with it's strategies, while Strategies.txt in the Data folder should be used for human players. I've done some testing and you can indeed edit the starting strategies by changing Default_AI_Strategies.txt, and you can add new ones, as long as you're not silly like me and try to give them the name of an existing strategy.

So that's a workaround, of sorts, for the time being. If you want to use custom strategies, just edit Default_AI_Strategies.txt and add or alter strategies to your heart's content. Only downside is that the AI players'll get to use those strategies too, and from what I've been told, you can't alter your strategies during the game, as they're only loaded during empire creation, so you'll be stuck with the same strategies for the whole game. Not an ideal workaround in anyone's book.

Suction feet are not to be trifled with!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de bheusi

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par bheusi le Dim, 2007-03-25 08:52

Another small annoyance in AI ship design and research choices... It isn´t upgrading its combat sensors, and is taking too long to research shields. Needless to say, a ship with lvl 1 CS and no shields will get pummeled by oone with level 15 combat sensors shields etc.

And the problem isn´t lack of RP since I´m playing a game with medium bonus to the AI, and it was ahead of me in research levels for a loooong time. The AI makes some really silly choices like researching 4, 5 weapon types, planetary engineering early on etc.

Sure, I could (and will) mod my games, but it saddens me that it looks like the game is being built for the mods, not the opposite. C´mon, it´s version 1.33, and the only way of enjoying the game is by modding it? I´m hoping the captain will see this topic and report this nasty AI behavior to Aaron. By the way... which mod has the best AI nowadays, BM or IRM? Thanx

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Cyber_Tech le Dim, 2007-03-25 18:15

bheusi:

It depends what you mean by "best" AI. If you want a lot of fights and agressive AI, IRM is maybe better for you. If you prefer a more peacefull quadrant but still some good ennemies that will challenge you, go with BM.

I have'nt played stock since v1.08, and I won't even try it for quite some time. I don't think it will ever surpass the MODs. And it's ok, I prefer Aaron to fix the problems instead of balancing the game.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de bheusi

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par bheusi le Dim, 2007-03-25 20:45

Yes I agree that solving the bugs is more important, but like I said before I don´t agree with leaving stock´s gameplay so screwed up.

Mods are made to give the player a different player experience. If the mod is necessary to ENJOY the game, then I would actually call BM or IRM an unofficial patch. I´ve been playing games for many years and SE V is the only game I recall that actually needs mods to be playable.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par JeffGeorge le Lun, 2007-03-26 14:17

bheusi wrote:
I´ve noticed that the "troop design without weapons" problem still occurs, through not as often as before.

It does the same thing with drones, though I don't know if it did that before 1.33 or if it's just been introduced.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de boromeo

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par boromeo le Lun, 2007-03-26 15:10

Possible bug

I'm playin a IRM 0.9c game with patch 1.33 , i dunno if it's a 1.33 bug or a game or a IRM one

On the log window it would say that 8 mines was constructed on x planet , but when i look at the ships/units window , all i have in all is 4

Someone else noticed that?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de tverdoon

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par tverdoon le Lun, 2007-03-26 15:22

If you had the minister to launch mines activated perhaps half were launched.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Prankowski

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Prankowski le Mar, 2007-03-27 15:51

i had a strange mine thing happen right now.
i secured a warppoint with mines armed with ionic-warheads (anti-engine) and an enemy ship came through the warppoint.
combat occured and the enemy ship was undamaged but all my mines where gone!!!
no message of of enemies flying into my mines or so...
and the ship didn´t have any mine-sweeper abilitys.

anybody got an idea??

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par bmaxa le Mer, 2007-03-28 06:47

AgentZero wrote:

If you want to use custom strategies, just edit Default_AI_Strategies.txt and add or alter strategies to your heart's content. Only downside is that the AI players'll get to use those strategies too, and from what I've been told, you can't alter your strategies during the game, as they're only loaded during empire creation, so you'll be stuck with the same strategies for the whole game. Not an ideal workaround in anyone's book.

Ai players can't use any strategies other then default one
for fleet task forces, and they can't even create task
forces as task force creation function is broken. Each
fleet gets only one task force with default strategy, that
is first one in default_ai_strategy file which is optimal
firing range. That's why we in irm use that strategy for
everything Eye-wink.
Other strategies then first one can't be even read from
file as function provided reads only first field when there
are more with same name.
Second, I have successfully changed properties for strategies during game play and game showed changes.
Perhaps adding new strategies during game play works too,
as data files are obviously readed when loading savegame.

Check it out.

Greetings, Branimir.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Helker le Jeu, 2007-03-29 08:19

Ships still use Warp Points not yet discovered...

http://it.geocities.com/s_noffke/SEVWarpPoints.JPG

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par evilginger le Jeu, 2007-03-29 08:29

But they do know where they are as even it you have not surveyed the system some one else has given you the location.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Nevyn le Jeu, 2007-03-29 23:48

Prankowski wrote:
i had a strange mine thing happen right now. i secured a warppoint with mines armed with ionic-warheads (anti-engine) and an enemy ship came through the warppoint. combat occured and the enemy ship was undamaged but all my mines where gone!!! no message of of enemies flying into my mines or so... and the ship didn´t have any mine-sweeper abilitys.

anybody got an idea??

Shields blocked all the damage?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Prankowski

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Prankowski le Ven, 2007-03-30 02:04

no, it was one ship with 350 points of shields.
i had 100 mines there so i think it should have been enough.
it´s still a mystery to me.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Duck le Lun, 2007-04-02 08:25

I have same promblem after install 1.33 :
- it impossible to make changes to strategies with 1.33 Sad, same player has some problem, but reinstall (and clear install 1.33 not help for me) Sad
- bomb not working Sad. Planet is able bombing only by rocket weapon. Ship with nuclear (or fusion) weapon not fire on the planet. So, i don't now how invade on planet with 10 or more weapon platform with nuclear missile. In 1.25 bomb work fine and with BM and with IRM

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de RasterOps

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par RasterOps le Lun, 2007-04-02 21:14

Am I missing something? My Fleets consist of at least three task forces and sometimes more. One of these is assigned Attack and Defense strategies of Maximum weapons range. One is Capture planets etc. While these are far from perfect they do work. It is still necessary to micromanage "Max Range" ships on an attack vector to start turning around now fool.

---
-my "Ministers are more sinister than Ministers... But who cares?"

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Lun, 2007-04-02 21:16

No, he means you can't change the details of the strategies under Empire Options.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: 1.33 bug query

Soumis par Fallen Haven le Lun, 2007-04-02 23:41

Another silly bug for SE5...

Edit : we seem to have found how to fix the attack planet problem. It should work properly in next IRM version (wich may be released soon).

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Research By Percentage SUCKS
  • Is the Patch Process Dead, and Other Thoughts...
  • Known SE5 v1.74 Bugs
  • Babylon 5 Wars SEV Mod Update
  • Space Empires V 1.74

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • Prolly a bit of a noob Q, but i dont really care
  • Space Empires V 1.44
  • Components.bmp background transparency colour?
  • Favourite Weapons Tech
  • Rescale combat effects
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.