Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 1 utilisateur et 149 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • Captain Kwok

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« December 2008  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V Multiplayer

Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Image de Badger
Soumis par Badger le Jeu, 2007-02-01 22:33 Space Empires V Multiplayer

Well,
I thought this up while at work - part of my reason is invalidated... but not all. Dam that torpedo, full speed ahead.

I keep spitting out ideas, some people find them interesting, some have their own way of doing things perfected enough that they are not interested. Others tell me, DO IT...

...so I WAS thinking, with IR and Balance mods down (was),
a perfect oportunity to see if there WAS really any advance in the stock AI for 1.25.

There are cahnges i am working on myself, and wanted to invite anyone interested to try them out with me.

my wish list for contributors includes: The Grendel, not for his enhanced Bananas, but for his tech mods (hope ours can co-exist..)..
CherryMoon's AI script improvements (i'm trying the better known 2 in my personal games - I'll say it again : those 2 kept me playing when i lost interest in stock Se5 due to the boring AI)...
Riptokus for his new shipsets - and general idea-checking (constant arguing Eye-wink )
Stuka - whom i'd actually ask to host the game - b/c he doesn't have time to commit to turns but might occaisionally be able to log turns to back up the AI.

Who'd i leave out for now?

Things I'd like to Playtest:
play if you are interested in testing these changes:
* turns out boarding-shuttle fighters are OUT Sad
* Torpedoes/Missiles fix (the simple version; the enhancement idea is better but still in progress ... it does work - didn't think it would.. but it's more work than i'm ready for)
The relatively simple fix just makes CSM's shorter-range, and torpedoes staggered in availability, each dependent on later techs. torps replace missiles as the longest-reach weapon, but have to be researched.
* Drones - my version. Closer to the original SFB drones.
* big troops - once again i agree with F.H.
* resistance to Boarding Parties - ship crews will fight harder than in regular stock, but not quite as tough as in IRM
* cargo fixes - you can't carry more weight than the hull & engines were designed for "for free" a 35 kt fighter, for example, takes 35kt - period.
(anyone who can show me how to script "1 fighter requires 1 bay?" support for working, not just cargo, fighters is ALOT more than empty space. ask anyone who's worked on one.)
*Tech tree changes - not so ambitious yet, but already present.
*AUTOCANNONS.
Oh, come on, you knew that was coming.
The DUC-"gun" becomes the autocannon - it has a CHANCE to shoot down seekers and fighters, yet amazingly enough, ultra-dense ultra-velocity projectiles, though effectively short range, can hurt ships.
As a general-purpose weapon, you will find the AI's hordes of cannon gunships are no longer helpless against anything OTHER than other short-range brawler ships... Be Prepared- this is the one I have playtested the most:
http://spaceempires5.com/en-US/node/2261#comment-13079
it makes quite a difference.

Hope to see you there.

‹ pbem large .cmb file - ways to prevent?? house rules? ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.
Image de Badger

No responses?

Soumis par Badger le Ven, 2007-02-02 07:19

You're not scared of a little ol' AutoCannon are ya?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Martock

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Martock le Ven, 2007-02-02 18:11

Not scare of an autocannon and I used to fill my mechs up with them back in the day. I wouldn't mind doing a bit o'play testing but I'm not usually free until midnight EST.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Atrocities
Mod Designer

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Atrocities le Ven, 2007-02-02 20:24

Can I infer from your post that English might not be your first language? Smiling

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Badger le Ven, 2007-02-02 20:45

hmmmn. B-Tech has come up an awful lot lately...

Anybody play the Strategic level Inner-Sphere game, Secession War?

The AC's I'm referring to here are quite different-
although the writer i liked - grey death legion writer - saw AC's much as i do.

But in this context, it's quite a different weapon. We've had rows about it..

Love to have you, tho!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

'Geek' is my first language!

Soumis par Badger le Ven, 2007-02-02 20:49

Atrocities wrote:
Can I infer from your post that English might not be your first language? :)

Hopefully that was just my horrid typing...
Which resembles that of a blind weasel on methamphetamines!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Martock

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Martock le Ven, 2007-02-02 21:04

Is this gonna be a PBW style or just a test the changes in a game vs. AI?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Badger le Ven, 2007-02-02 21:16

i was referring to multiplayer... BUT

in the meantime i keep BEGGING people to try for themselves how the game changes when you put fallen haven's autocannon in the game IN PLACE OF the DUC the stupid AI can't get enough of.
(replace DUC in data/components.txt file with Ac )
give that a try and get back to me so i can see if that's just "my beautiful baby" complex I'm seeing or if it really is that drastically different.! ?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Martock

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Martock le Ven, 2007-02-02 21:21

Where do I get a hold of FH's auto-cannon? I'm guessing I will have to start a new game for this one or can this be added on the fly to a current game?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

AutoCannon...

Soumis par Badger le Sam, 2007-02-03 01:37

1. Yes, you can add it to an already-running game. In fact, I kept suggesting people add it to 1/2 forgotten old games aginst helpless AI's as its trial run. I did:
http://www.spaceempires5.com/en-US/node/2287#comment-13077

2. This is Fh's AutoCannon, slightly modified for stock. If you are running IRM already, just cut the DUC altogether and paste the next component in its place.
if you need it for stock, this should work: find the duc in the data folder, components.txt file... use "find" under edit... (find cannon or depleted , whatevr u like) - right there, paste this, then cut out altogether the DUC entry.
if you keeep both, the components are read by place 3, so you will cause some strangeness unless you REPLACE, not just add.

the file? cut aand paste THIS:


Name := AutoCannon
Description := Short range cannon which fires bursts of ultradense,

ultravelocity shells.
Picture Number := 179
Maximum Level := 100
Tonnage Space Taken Formula := 20
Tonnage Structure Formula := 20 * (1 + ((Get_Empire_Tech_Level("Armor")) * 0.1))
Cost Minerals Formula := 70 * (1 + (([%Level%] - 1) * 0.05))
Cost Organics Formula := 1 * (1 + (([%Level%] - 1) * 0.05))
Cost Radioactives Formula := 2 * (1 + (([%Level%] - 1) * 0.05))
Supply Amount Used Formula := 2
Ordnance Amount Used Formula := 2
Can Be Placed On Vehicle Types := Ship, Base, Satellite
Can Be Placed In Ship Sections := Outer Hull
Component Type List := Technological
General Group := Weapons
Custom Group := 0
Number Of Requirements := 1
Requirements Evaluation Availability := AND
Requirements Evaluation Allows Placement := TRUE
Requirements Evaluation Allows Usage := TRUE
Requirement 1 Description := Empire must have at least tech level 1 in Projectile

Weapons.
Requirement 1 Formula := Get_Empire_Tech_Level("Projectile Weapons") >= (1 +

([%Level%] - 1))
Requirement 2 Description :=
Requirement 2 Formula := Get_Empire_Tech_Level("Armor") >= 0
Requirement 3 Description :=
Requirement 3 Formula := Get_Empire_Tech_Level("Storage") >= 0
Number Of Abilities := 2
Ability 1 Type := Ordnance Storage
Ability 1 Description := Provides storage for [%Amount1%] units of ordnance.
Ability 1 Scope := Space Object
Ability 1 Range Formula := 0
Ability 1 Amount 1 Formula := 60 * (1 + ((Get_Empire_Tech_Level("Storage")) * 0.06))
Ability 1 Amount 2 Formula := 0
Ability 2 Type := Multiplex Tracking
Ability 2 Description := Can track [%Amount1%] targets at once.
Ability 2 Scope := Space Object
Ability 2 Range Formula := 0
Ability 2 Amount 1 Formula := 5
Ability 2 Amount 2 Formula := 0
Weapon Type := Point-Defense
Weapon Delivery Type := Projectile
Weapon Target Type List := Drone, Seeker, Fighter, Satellite, Ship, Base
Weapon Damage Type Formula := "Normal"
Weapon Space At Range Distance Increment := 10.0
Weapon Space Min Damage At Range := 0.0
Weapon Space Max Damage At Range := 0.0
Weapon Space To Hit Modifier At Range := 0.0
Weapon Space Min Damage Modifier Formula := (45 + (([%Level%] - 1) * 4.5) * 0.2) - iif([%Range%] >

Min(70, (([%Level%] - 1) * 5) + 50), 10000, 0)
Weapon Space Max Damage Modifier Formula := (45 + (([%Level%] - 1) * 4.5) * 0.2) - iif([%Range%] >

Min(70, (([%Level%] - 1) * 5) + 50), 10000, 0)
Weapon Space To Hit Modifier Formula := 30 - ((([%Range%] - 25) ^ 2) ^ 0.55)
Weapon Reload Rate MS Formula := 1.8 * (1000 - ((([%Level%] - 1) * 10) * 0.25))
Weapon Display Type := Bolt
Weapon Space Display Effect Name := Small Bolt 1
Weapon Ground Display Effect Name := Bolt 1
Weapon Explosion Effect Name := [Random Specific Type] Weapon Explosion
Weapon Sound Effect Name := Small Depleted Uranium Cannon
Weapon Bolt Speed := 0.07

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: AutoCannon...

Soumis par Riptokus le Sam, 2007-02-03 01:56

Don't forget to backup your old components file.

Back to UV Mapping Eye-wink

(shoot me please?)

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Martock

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Martock le Sam, 2007-02-03 15:27

Okie dokie...I'll give it a whirl when i get home tonight. I'm in a war with an AI right now and will probably get into another with 3 others shortly.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Re: AutoCannon...

Soumis par Badger le Sam, 2007-02-03 21:42

Riptokus wrote:
(shoot me please?)
With an autocannon? Love to. Eye-wink

Anyway, the irony - it was pointed out that not long after suggesting that AC's NOT be multiplex tracking, to differentiate from DEDICATED point defense -
i forgot to edit out the multiplex ability from the AC stats i posted.
also, I think of it as a burst, not just lower reload time - i plan on making multibarrel art for it - s i would think damamge should be a little more variable (not same min-max).

Sorry for any confusion or inconvenience my hasty oversigth inflicted!
ps> also ironically, i then find out its the ONE post i can't edit... Hmmmn.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Dim, 2007-02-04 20:19

Just so you realize, the multiplex tracking ability doesn't actually DO anything. Its just a leftover from SE4.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Riptokus le Dim, 2007-02-04 20:29

Multiplex tracking should be back in IMO. It was standard on all my PD ships. Without it, fighters tear up stuff.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Re: just so you realize

Soumis par Badger le Dim, 2007-02-04 21:08

Phoenix-D wrote:
Just so you realize, the multiplex tracking ability doesn't actually DO anything...

Sir, i believe you are mistaken:
http://www.spaceempires5.com/en-US/node/2441#comment-13811
all i can say is sim it and double-check.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Drones... Thanks, Grendel!

Soumis par Badger le Dim, 2007-02-04 21:10

..Are fixed, at least in the sense of not warping -
so there is actually a point to having ships launch them now.
just watch out for genetically-engineered banana!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Captain Kwok
Mod Designer

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Captain Kwok le Dim, 2007-02-04 22:11

Phoenix-D wrote:
Just so you realize, the multiplex tracking ability doesn't actually DO anything. Its just a leftover from SE4.

To further that thought, multiplex tracking isn't even intended to divide up fire in the fashion being described. It allowed a ship to target other ships after destroying since SE:IV weapons fire was sequential and didn't suffer the same damage overkill problem that SE:V does.

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Re: just so you realize

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Dim, 2007-02-04 22:37

Badger wrote:
Phoenix-D wrote:
Just so you realize, the multiplex tracking ability doesn't actually DO anything...

Sir, i believe you are mistaken:
http://www.spaceempires5.com/en-US/node/2441#comment-13811
all i can say is sim it and double-check.

I removed the multiplex ability, and a ship still fires on as many targets as its firepower and strategy will allow..

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Re: just so you realize

Soumis par Badger le Dim, 2007-02-04 23:03

hmmn...
Interesting, that.

so you get multiplex with or without the ability, in effect?
i guess what you think you are seeing graphically (like the ssatellite shooting for its whole group - isn't necessarily what you get.

...for what its worth, I really appreciate you CHEcKING instead of assuming.

i presume what i was seeing was the ship shooting -not QUITE simultaneously- but simply very quickly at each target - i mean, hell, its got 10 - probably 3-4 at any target satisfied the targetting criteria?(of dmg assigned, i mean).

Do you REALLY think you will subvert System Vampyre before it subverts YOU?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Dim, 2007-02-04 23:26

Pretty much, yeah. You can do it manually, if you like: run a sim and instead of right-clicking on a target click the..uh I think its "targeting" button. That will let you set a seperate target for each weapon..

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

"PlayTest Me" Update

Soumis par Badger le Mer, 2007-02-07 18:27

Update:
You know, the changes aren't really sweeping enough to be called a real mod yet. This is still more or less playtesting specific changes.

* turns out boarding-shuttle fighters are OUT
* Drones - my version.
drone warheads are soon to be fixed:
http://www.spaceempires5.com/en-US/node/2430(thanks for the heads-up Kwok!)
Closer to the original SFB drones. PeekAtChu wanted HonorHarrington-style IntraSystem cruise missiles... so there goes. so far, so good. They're smaller, more balanced, and now there is a POINT to having drone-launcher components...
* Big Troops - once again i agree with F.H.
Done.
* Resistance to Boarding Parties - ship crews will fight harder than in regular stock, but not quite as tough as in IRM
* Cargo fixes - you can't carry more weight than the hull & engines were designed for "for free" a 35-kt fighter, for example, takes 35kt - period.
Having trouble getting to recognize the "cargo complex" (lg cargo bay), but otherwise all is well!
still working on stomping the fighter bay exploit, but you will no longer find several hundred ktons of stuff fitting on a ship for a few kt's of space/weight. Bulk is bulk.
*Tech tree changes - not so ambitious yet, but already present.
Computer technology is a major tech, and required for some technologies you may take for granted. Several techs will have multiple requirements (as Q. Torpedo was meant to in stock, for example)
*External Ordnance Racks/Larger weapons:
suggested by several players, several ways to fix it. i for one would like to see fighters carry 1-shot missiles or torpedo racks. Someone suggested making drones even smaller and firable by fighters like cruise missiles from a backfire bomber...
*AUTOCANNONS. Eye-wink

..turn out to be fairly effective. i had switched sides in my old stock game, and found myself running an autocannon destroyer against one of my old empire's destroyers...
Yes, the "Badger"... 4 large-weapon mounted beam brawler with better tech all-around, more & better shields and armor...

A human player might have turned out of short range and eaten me alive with the superior range of antiproton beams...

The 10-Autocannon lower tech destroyer lived up to its name... it still had almost all of its armor when my old empires ship exploded.
...and turns out to be more than a match for a squadron of 6 fighters...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Re: "PlayTest Me" Update - Anyone Up Today?

Soumis par Badger le Ven, 2007-02-09 09:34

Grendel... Ginger?

Anyone wanting to try out some minor modifications to how stuff works..

i keep wanting to do some serious changes, but, until i can make AI progress - or team with someone who can - I don't want to think of this as a mod, just slight changes to stock.

i f anyone is interested in a small game today .. lEt me know...(yawns).

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Dim, 2007-02-11 13:19

As far as cargo goes, keep in mind that modern ships can often carry more than they weigh. Its a bit different in space ships, but the same principle applies..

You probably won't be able to make drones firable from fighters. SE5 won't let you put cargo in cargo. Long-range extremely long reload seekers would work, though.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Re: Put your Mod Where Your Mouth Is > BillyGoatGruff Game

Soumis par Badger le Dim, 2007-02-11 13:50

1- Most vessels list displacement both loaded and unloaded. The full weight with load has to be considered for movement,etc., and deign terms.
When you are talking bulk and hullspace,(lets not get into external cargo, e.g., tugs), capacity is what you are really "buying" in the design. The bulk doesn't disappear into a pocket dimension (except in the Mytht books Smiling )

2. As it says in the Update(or should), the 1-Shot seekers and 1-shot Large Weapons (grendel's -although the rocket pods were already close to that concept), have been implemented.

3. So far, only the one person has asked for drone launching from fighters, so i didn't work on it( my idea of drones are still a little large for this)- the idea was to make seekers MORE customizable using drone rules, I accomplished that another way, its got its own forum.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Research By Percentage SUCKS
  • What does Environmental Resistance do?
  • OK Ship Mod
  • Space Empires V
  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • Advanced Game Stuff, Not Looking for Details
  • WP beams' graphics clipping problem
  • Malfador, is it time you had a QA department?
  • IRTM v 0.54c is out!
  • Map Editor
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.