Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 4 utilisateurs et 119 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • GambitUK
  • HeberMagalhaes
  • Jozsf
  • Arpeegy

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« August 2008  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Accueil » news » forums » Support & Feedback » Scenarios & Mods » SE:V MODs

Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Mylon le Dim, 2007-01-28 02:11 SE:V MODs

To my understanding, components on a ship are destroyed in the order of armor, then outer components, then inner components. In Balance mod, engines have to be mounted on the outside. In this kind of scenario, I ask, what is really the point of critical inside components (bridge, crew, life support, ect) if by the time they are at risk, the ship is dead in the water anyway?

‹ The Missile Crisis in Balance Mod AI to-do list for early game ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par evilginger le Dim, 2007-01-28 03:00

Direction of fire also seems to have a noticable effect I have seen ships disengage having had their weapons destroyed but their engines not at all. In these cases weapons and engines where in the ships outer hull the only difference that was the weapons where at the front of the ship and the engines at the back. Further the majority of the hits where on the front arc of the ship as ships despite the omni directionality of weapons do tend to try to point towards and fly at their enemies only turning to maintain the set firing range if they get too close

This is very much the case of my ship designs and is true of the majority of AI built ships just make a few tests using auto complete and you will see this

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Nevyn le Dim, 2007-01-28 06:50

Engines can be repaired a lot easier than a dead crew can be replaced and trained to the same level. Also things like shield regenerators are great on the inside hull, that way your shields keep trying to come back up and if you can take the heat off the damaged ship for a bit you might get enough shields to take one or two hits back up in the mean time.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Mylon le Dim, 2007-01-28 10:53

The point I'm trying to make is that there is no purpose to the redundant systems such as an auxiliary control, using additional life supports/crew quarters, and so on.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Fallen Haven le Dim, 2007-01-28 15:55

Mylon wrote:
The point I'm trying to make is that there is no purpose to the redundant systems such as an auxiliary control, using additional life supports/crew quarters, and so on.

In my mod it does have some use since it's possible to get internal damage before all the armor is gone. It's not rare that a ship leave battle with half it's componment damaged or destroyed. I agree though, in stock, if you start taking internal damage, you are most likely already dead...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Mylon le Dim, 2007-01-28 17:09

May I ask how you accomplish this? Did you change normal damage to do some damage to insides?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Captain Kwok
Mod Designer

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Captain Kwok le Dim, 2007-01-28 17:34

Essentially you make leaky armor and shields, that is weapon damage has varying amounts of penetration versus shields or armor, so that it leaks through and can damage internal components. Kind of like the exploding panel effect in Star Trek. Sticking out tongue

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Fallen Haven le Dim, 2007-01-28 17:51

Mylon wrote:
May I ask how you accomplish this? Did you change normal damage to do some damage to insides?

Like Captain Kwok said, it's a "leaky" armor. But for it to work it needs the damage negation of emissive armor and changes to damage types. Also some stacking effects or else damage would always breach the armor. Not sure if it will still work that way with the next patch, but that's how i pulled it off.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par evilginger le Dim, 2007-01-28 17:56

My tactic for the IRM mod is to pack the ship with supply & Ordinance modules to try to protect weapons in the outer hull and they have to go in the outer hull in that Mod this has the secondary effect of the ships and fleets being well supplied

If you are lucky you just lose a lot of supply to damage which leaks but if you layer shields over armour you are mostly ok until the shields fail unless you get hit by something that which skips armour or shields

This incidentally makes crystalline tech nasty in the IRM especially early on as shields are slower to get than balance Mod or stock. However this ballences as the AI is well able to use them on you.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Fallen Haven le Dim, 2007-01-28 18:14

evilginger wrote:
This incidentally makes crystalline tech nasty in the IRM especially early on as shields are slower to get than balance Mod or stock. However this ballences as the AI is well able to use them on you.

Thick armor can stop cristalline weapons in my mod. Of course, you need a lot of armor to stop even basic cristal weapons...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Mylon le Dim, 2007-01-28 20:01

Leaky armor doesn't cause damage to internal components though, does it? I'd personally go for the SEIV damage model where once armor is breached, anything is fair game, rather than the model where some components can be used to protect more vital components (as detailed above with cargo and supply components). Sort of forcing all components to be mounted on the "outside", so to speak. Is there a way to do this?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Captain Kwok
Mod Designer

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Captain Kwok le Dim, 2007-01-28 20:30

By design leaky armor is porous and being so allows some of the damage to migrate to inner/outer layers.

If you were to make all the slots inner or outer, then you'd simulate the damage system in SE:IV... Shields > Armor > Internals

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par evilginger le Dim, 2007-01-28 21:11

Having played Fallen havens IRM mod I can confirm the armour is leaky and you will generally take at least some internal damage in any combat until you develop shields when you will find that the shields leak and the armour takes damage, until the shields go down. I would also point out that damage defiantly comes off the outer hull first and is directional.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Fallen Haven le Lun, 2007-01-29 07:49

Captain Kwok wrote:
By design leaky armor is porous and being so allows some of the damage to migrate to inner/outer layers.

If you were to make all the slots inner or outer, then you'd simulate the damage system in SE:IV... Shields > Armor > Internals

Well, it's not exactly how it works in my mod. All my armors can soak some damage, if the piercing damage is lower than what the armor can soak, no internal damage occur. I also made a formula to increase the armor capacity to soak damage in relation to how many plating you have. A single panel of armor don't stop much, but 10 can take a lot of beating before they start to "leak", and a battleship with 20+ panels can completly ignore weak weapons for a while. Also, poweful weapons will get through my armor much sooner, a massive mount can probably get through a frigate armor on first shot, but a dread will take several heavy hits before any damage start leaking in...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Mylon le Lun, 2007-01-29 10:28

I think I'll follow Kwok's suggestion and remove the inner/outer distinction. At least, if there's an easy way to do this like editing text files (and not necessarily for each and every shipset).

However, the variable leakiness sounds like a really neat idea. Mind sharing your secret, Fallen?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Captain Kwok
Mod Designer

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Captain Kwok le Lun, 2007-01-29 11:54

Suicide Junkie had produced a minor treatsie on it over at SE.net, essentially you have armor that has a penetration percent of say 50 percent. If there is 100 damage, the 1st armor absorbs 50 damage, allows 50 to pass to the next armor which takes 25 damage and passes on 25 to the next armor (or perhaps internals) etc. The more armor you place, the more overall absorption you'll get

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Badger le Lun, 2007-01-29 12:16

Fallen Haven wrote:
... All my armors can soak some damage, if the piercing damage is lower than what the armor can soak, no internal damage occur. I also made a formula to increase the armor capacity to soak damage in relation to how many plating you have. A single panel of armor don't stop much, but 10 can take a lot of beating before they start to "leak", and a battleship with 20+ panels can completly ignore weak weapons for a while. Also, poweful weapons will get through my armor much sooner, a massive mount can probably get through a frigate armor on first shot, but a dread will take several heavy hits before any damage start leaking in...

Isn't this more or less IDEAL? Why WOULDN'T you want armor to work this way?
in one of my threads, someone preached to my choir that armor can be penetrated BFORE it is entirely vaporized...
Troll? No, Sir, I am a BADGER!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Damage priorities - Armor - Outer - Inner

Soumis par Fallen Haven le Lun, 2007-01-29 16:47

Badger wrote:

Isn't this more or less IDEAL? Why WOULDN'T you want armor to work this way?
in one of my threads, someone preached to my choir that armor can be penetrated BFORE it is entirely vaporized...

Stock armor stop everything until it reach zero. The only way damage get through before that is with a special weapon that skip armor. But a weapon that skip armor don't damage armor at all, all the damage get through.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Badger

- Armor -

Soumis par Badger le Lun, 2007-01-29 16:59

1. In case it was unclear, I meant it SHOULD work your way.
Had my first real battle in your mod, and was so pleased with how it worked that its going to be a post on its own...

don't worry, FH, I'm bragging on ya!

Secondly, even outside of your mod, all I'm asking folks consider is nothing complex: just that armor SOMEWHAT honor the ship component graph - "directional"

Troll? No, Sir, I am a BADGER!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Any chance of different setup options for each player?
  • Balace Mod for Stock SEV Petition
  • Ok What am I missing
  • Space Empires V 1.74
  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • UI Mod: Division of Light
  • Just an idea I had.
  • Star Wars SEV ship set available
  • Resource Shortage
  • Balace Mod for Stock SEV Petition
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.