Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 4 utilisateurs et 223 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • goduranus
  • Qcontinuum
  • Randallw
  • ForesterSOF

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« December 2008  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V General

Meson Blasters for Point Defense

Soumis par Vermithrax le Sam, 2006-11-25 13:02 Space Empires V General

At half the space and 1.5 x the hits, MB PD is defintely the way to go.

The reload rate in component.txt is 500.0 milliseconds as compared with the 2000 millisecond norm. If thats the way its supposed to be then the MB PD is 12 x as powerful as regualr PD (2x for smaller size, 1.5x for more hits, and 4x for faster relaoding). Maybe 500.0 should be 5000, then we would have 2x1.5/2.5 = 1.2x as powerful as regualr PD, which seems more reasonable.

‹ Center View on Active Hex when Spacebar Pressed SEV Crash Bug & Game Password ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.
Image de Thy Reaper
Mod Designer

Meson Blasters... they never cease to amaze me

Soumis par Thy Reaper le Sam, 2006-11-25 13:50

It seems MM went Meson Blaster happy this time around. Anything meson blaster seems far superior to all other weapondry...

-----
Give me atmopshperic manipulation cannons, or give me death!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de cordas

Yup they are the weapon of

Soumis par cordas le Sam, 2006-11-25 15:34

Yup they are the weapon of the discerning Evil Overlord of the Galaxy, small but beautifully powerfull and only use a small amount of supplies. Outside Organic tech these have to be the most powerful direct fire weapon in the game, and the PD blaster is just the ultimate in defence, bung this alongside some bomblets and you never need worry about drones, fighters, satalites or missiles..... In fact they are the only thing that stops the Capital Missle from being the best weapon in the game.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de cordas

Yup they are the weapon of

Soumis par cordas le Sam, 2006-11-25 15:34

Yup they are the weapon of the discerning Evil Overlord of the Galaxy, small but beautifully powerfull and only use a small amount of supplies. Outside Organic tech these have to be the most powerful direct fire weapon in the game, and the PD blaster is just the ultimate in defence, bung this alongside some bomblets and you never need worry about drones, fighters, satalites or missiles..... In fact they are the only thing that stops the Capital Missle from being the best weapon in the game.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Meson PD seems to be the

Soumis par Fishman le Dim, 2006-11-26 23:24

Meson PD seems to be the only PD that works. All other PDs simply don't work fast enough. Worth noting, however, is that meson PD is only about 6x as powerful all told, because it costs 2x the research to develop (you need both PD and meson research). This is still very good, as the alternatives are just not worth the space to use!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de se5a
Mod Designer

which is why some of us

Soumis par se5a le Lun, 2006-11-27 00:06

which is why some of us refuse to play stock.

-----
an se5a is a ww1 fighter, it is also a car.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Well, the alternative is

Soumis par Fishman le Lun, 2006-11-27 02:00

Well, the alternative is that either all the weapons are the same, or one will demonstrate itself as the superior choice. I mean, how else do you score shooty-downy-things except by their ability to shoot things down?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de ekolis
Mod Designer

LOL You could have

Soumis par ekolis le Lun, 2006-11-27 12:18

LOL Laughing out loud
You could have shooty-downy-things that are good at shooting down one type of thing, and other shooty-downy-things that are good at shooting down another type of thing...
To be a bit more concrete, what if you modded the game as such:
PDB: 10 damage, 500ms firing rate -> 20 damage/second
PDC: 20 damage, 2000ms firing rate -> 10 damage/second
So far it looks like PDB are the big winners, right? Well, what if you gave fighters emissive armor which deflected 9 damage from every hit? Laughing out loud
Then the effective damage vs. fighters would be:
PDB: 1 damage, 500ms firing rate -> 2 damage/second
PDC: 11 damage, 2000ms firing rate -> 5.5 damage/second
But seekers don't have emissive armor, so they would use the first set of damage values. So in effect, you would want to use PDB when facing seekers and PDC when facing fighters.
Pretty cool, huh? Eye-wink

edit: fixed PDC damage vs. fighters

~~~
Mr. Flibble says...
Game over, boys! Laughing out loud

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Eh, then I'd stick with the

Soumis par Fishman le Mar, 2006-11-28 20:48

Eh, then I'd stick with the ones for shooting down seekers anyway. Fighters only get Combat Sensors and can't hit 250% eva. Sticking out tongue What would be fun is putting PDBs on fighters to create interceptor planes.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Rilo57

How to deal with fighter swarms.

Soumis par Rilo57 le Mer, 2006-11-29 12:14

A couple other things to take into concideration. One is that when your ship is in range that all the in range weapons fire at once. Overkilling a fighter, your ship gets swarmed even though you have the firepower to kill all of them, you don't have the reload rate. for those fast moving fighters it would be nice to have a bunch of point defense weapons that have different ranges. that way they would pick different targets quicker (waist fewer shots on an already distroyed ship).

another thought is with formations and multiple ships you would have a similar effect to having weapons of different range, a couple of ships would still get swarmed....

modding a weapon that would have a real low damage but a very fast reload rate might be the thing to handle the fighter swarm. The other would be the area effect weapon damage.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

armor

Soumis par damador le Mer, 2006-11-29 12:30

armor with DR ~20 is enough 4 that

playing BM and my baseships are immune to almost anything Smiling

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

What about tachyon weapons

Soumis par evilginger le Mer, 2006-11-29 14:46

What about Tachyon weapons and other shield and weapon armour skipping weapons. I have always found they hurt most things fairly quickly.

What I think PD weapons need is independent targeting so that no two weapons will engage the same target and allow the use of mounts to give rise to point defence batteries only shoots once but with much more damage and perhaps range

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Skipping armor is probably

Soumis par Fishman le Mer, 2006-11-29 22:51

Skipping armor is probably the fastest fighter kill. Shields don't scale up very quickly on fighters, and only produce about 100 points per generator. Armor, on the other hand, goes up much faster. Nullweapon PD would eat through fighters like popcorn, though. They skip both shields and armor, and fighters of any techlevel always have puny structure value and die instantly.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de ekolis
Mod Designer

Yeah, especially since SE5

Soumis par ekolis le Jeu, 2006-11-30 10:43

Yeah, especially since SE5 now behaves like MOO2 in terms of armor piercing weapons - once the structure is gone, BOOM! Don't need to destroy the armor! (Unlike SE4 where the AP weapons had to chew through the armor once they were done with the internals)
Ever considered creating specialized point defense nullspace cannons? Now THAT would be evil... Laughing out loud

~~~
Mr. Flibble says...
Game over, boys! Laughing out loud

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Might try to Mod one

Soumis par evilginger le Jeu, 2006-11-30 10:57

I might have a go moding the PD mounts and if that works the nulspace

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Babylon 5 Wars SEV Mod Update
  • Known SE5 v1.74 Bugs
  • Research By Percentage SUCKS
  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Bad Bookkeeping

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • complete hang if windows locks desktop due to inactivity
  • speen of IRM
  • Babylon 5 Wars SEV Mod Update
  • Increasing planet max population
  • Brother can You spare a Dime?
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.