Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 2 utilisateurs et 164 invités en ligne.

Utilisateurs en ligne

  • Vince278
  • Cyber_Tech

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« Décembre 2008  
Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V General

1.15 Change log

Image de Combat Wombat
Soumis par Combat Wombat le Jeu, 2006-11-16 19:44 Space Empires V General

Version 1.15:
1. Fixed - The Launch/Recover window was not showing the correct units in space during a combat
simulation.
2. Fixed - The Launch/Recover window would sometimes not launch a unit and show an empty unit
group in space.
3. Fixed - Drones were not dying when they impacted their targets.
4. Fixed - Empires were getting research in areas they didn't have access to via treaties.
5. Fixed - Messages from treaty elements were going to the wrong player.
6. Fixed - Autosave Turns are now saved on the machine and not per game. You'll need to turn
this on if you had it on in an old savegame.
7. Fixed - The intelligence event which kills research progress was setting the progress to
a giant negative number. This would result in some research areas showing hundreds
of turns to complete.
8. Fixed - Speed up for computer player combat.
9. Added - Added progress bars to computer player turns. Green is ship movement, red is combat,
blue is the end of all player turns.
10. Fixed - Sometimes combat between AI players would crash and end turn processing would never complete.
11. Fixed - Ground combat between AI players was never ending.
12. Fixed - Some ministers would not work unless the "Vehicle Design" minister was selected.
13. Fixed - Right-clicking on the Victory Conditions would cause an error.
13. Fixed - Warp points should never be placed within 2 sectors of a black hole center.
14. Fixed - The Intelligence button should be disabled in games where intelligence projects are not
allowed (the Construction Queues button was being disabled instead).
15. Fixed - A stellar manipulation would only destroy the first stellar manip component on use even
if it was already destroyed.
16. Fixed - You can't start a new stellar manipulation while the animation for one is going on.
17. Fixed - Alliances were causing a crash during end turn processing.
18. Fixed - Alliances might cause a crash when the game was shutdown.
19. Fixed - AI messages about alliances sometimes contained unreplaced flags.
20. Fixed - The AI would sometimes tell you to remove your colonies from a system you were not in.
21. Fixed - Some speedups for Game Load and statistics.
22. Fixed - The game now stores each empires specific screen layout and restores it on their turn.
23. Fixed - In a Simultaneous Same Machine Game with only 1 human player, there's no need to show
the Login window.
24. Fixed - Atmospheric conversion was not firing off when it should.
25. Fixed - Your vehicle does not get any bonus movement unless it has at least 1 standard movement.
26. Added - Icon over a planet in Tactical Combat if the attacker cannot bombard the planet because of treaties.

‹ AI and challenging games? Alien population on my colonized planet? ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.
Image de Setekh

wootles

Soumis par Setekh le Jeu, 2006-11-16 19:53

Looks to be a good solid change log! Impressive progress on the bug fixing!
To the whiners: see? if you just have a little patience you can see that the development team are committed to resolving the issues brought up by the community.

Looking forward to the release of this patch. Smiling

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Second that

Soumis par evilginger le Jeu, 2006-11-16 20:09

Just to second that and say that I look forward the next patch surfacing

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

neg

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Jeu, 2006-11-16 20:58

Setekh wrote:
Looks to be a good solid change log! Impressive progress on the bug fixing! To the whiners: see? if you just have a little patience you can see that the development team are committed to resolving the issues brought up by the community.

Looking forward to the release of this patch. :)

Quit trolling, will you? All you're accomplishing here is to piss the "whiners" off, which will lead to MORE bitching (justified, at that) not less.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

YES This seems to address

Soumis par Wink le Jeu, 2006-11-16 21:28

YES

This seems to address my biggest problems! and i LOVE the idea of progress meters on AI turn and end of turn.. it may still take a while, but I can at least judge progression now!

THANK YOU AARON!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Interesting update

Soumis par Helker le Jeu, 2006-11-16 21:33

Interesting Update, but I still don't understand if the "Not Bombard Planet" treaty prevents bombarding any planet or just the planets of the empire with you have the treaty...

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

I love the idea of progress

Soumis par JakeCourtney le Jeu, 2006-11-16 21:46

I love the idea of progress meters also, and I love that the Alliance crashing bugs are getting fixed. Good news. Patch is coming along nicely.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

bombard

Soumis par Phoenix-D le Jeu, 2006-11-16 22:02

Helker wrote:
Interesting Update, but I still don't understand if the "Not Bombard Planet" treaty prevents bombarding any planet or just the planets of the empire with you have the treaty...

It prevents you from bombarding any planet.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Request for Fleet transfer improvements

Soumis par Robert le Jeu, 2006-11-16 22:02

I'm pleased that things are moving forward and I hope the AI processing improvements do the job.

I have two requests for the Fleet transfer screen.

There is open room to the left of the ship name and also to the right of where -(Core)- is.

I would like to see the damage percentage added to one side and the experience points of the ships added to the other.

It would be very helpful in adding and subtracting ships to a fleet.

(btw, is there any way to see the experience points of a Fleet?)

ps - I'll also chime in that I think it's rather odd how the "bombard planet" component gets expanded to all empires, not just the one you are negotiating with.

If it's an individual treaty, then all items should be individual unless clearly stated otherwise.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

yeah i ran into that problem

Soumis par putty le Ven, 2006-11-17 04:32

yeah i ran into that problem while playing MOO2. if you give a tech to a friendly empire, theres nothing stopping it from turing around and giving that same tech to other (enemy) empires.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

I don't get it. Why does

Soumis par Janster le Ven, 2006-11-17 07:27

I don't get it.

Why does computer battles have to be modeled at all, it just eats CPU time, causes massive slowdown, and really does NOTHING for the game.

Just count the unit up by weightpoints, and roll a dice or something mkay?

AI battleproblems has been a real pain in the side of this game, I'm glad its being fixed, but boy could you have skipped that part.

Janster

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

i get it ?

Soumis par Thunar le Ven, 2006-11-17 10:02

Janster wrote:
I don't get it.

Why does computer battles have to be modeled at all, it just eats CPU time, causes massive slowdown, and really does NOTHING for the game.

Just count the unit up by weightpoints, and roll a dice or something mkay?

AI battleproblems has been a real pain in the side of this game, I'm glad its being fixed, but boy could you have skipped that part.

Janster

couldn't that result to one AI designing ships that beats other AI in every battle, while in 'real' battle vs human it looses each time, while those other AI's that were defeated by that one could have stand a better chance vs the human ???

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Rilbur

Simulate AI Battles

Soumis par Rilbur le Ven, 2006-11-17 10:24

A) The AI is treated exactly has a human player across the board for a reason.

B) What happens when (in MP) someone isn't able to turn in their turn on time and the AI takes over for a turn? They are NOT oging ot be happy to discover that they had their turn "rolled" instead of played.

There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Schweet

Soumis par jacob4408 le Ven, 2006-11-17 12:25

Looking forward to the 1.15 patch and many thanks for the relentless dedication to improving the game.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Caduceus

Patch 1.15

Soumis par Caduceus le Ven, 2006-11-17 14:10

Quote:
7. Fixed - The intelligence event which kills research progress was setting the progress to a giant negative number. This would result in some research areas showing hundreds of turns to complete.

Negative 2000000 Research points!?! AIEGH!!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

:)

Soumis par damador le Ven, 2006-11-17 14:30

immm they should reduce % of the total research point that was put in the tree

10 or 20 % from the total already used for that tree

it shouldnt be the constant number - later in game when i have ~300 000 research per turn even 2 mil substraction isnt pain

but at the begin of the game it could hurt ( especialy when targeteed the hull size ... )

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Ummm, 2 patch logs since the

Soumis par Dizzy le Ven, 2006-11-17 18:48

Ummm, 2 patch logs since the 1.13 and I hear boarding parties are still broken. Why has this not be addressed?

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

be patient

Soumis par damador le Ven, 2006-11-17 19:02

last time i was right about 1.13 Smiling now we should have 1.19

so it should be fixed in meantime Smiling

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Rilbur

Guessing

Soumis par Rilbur le Ven, 2006-11-17 19:49

Dizzy wrote:
Ummm, 2 patch logs since the 1.13 and I hear boarding parties are still broken. Why has this not be addressed?

Gueses: Boarding parties aren't as high a priority as osme of the other fixes. Boarding parties are still beyond him to fix (he hasn't isolated the error). He's fixing issues that get reported more often (don't think thats the case, I believe he uses a FILO system to deal with bugs).
There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de SirKid

I would like to add my

Soumis par SirKid le Ven, 2006-11-17 20:47

I would like to add my support to the idea of adding teh precent of damage to the Fleet transfer screen. I think this is needed badly. I sometimes have to pull out pen and pager to take notes on which ones to pull out. 8-(

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Mod Designer

agreed

Soumis par ergie272 le Sam, 2006-11-18 05:35

I agree 100%

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Very nice, I guess we'll see

Soumis par ShunterAlhena le Sam, 2006-11-18 08:38

Very nice, I guess we'll see a good 3-4 more builds before next patch is released, so we're in for a huge treat of fixes Smiling
As for planetary bombardment, I see it as a galaxywide ban for humanitarian reasons... in my galaxy everyone had to sign the Eridani Edict treaty (Honor Harrington book series, anyone? Eye-wink) that prevents star destruction, B.H. creation, planetary bombardment, etc, so it's a nice and friendly place even in wartime Smiling

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

PLEASE go ahead and release

Soumis par solops le Sam, 2006-11-18 09:29

PLEASE go ahead and release a patch of some kind. I would very, very much prefer many small patches to long waits for big patches, especially early in a game’s life when some bugs are severe. If people do not want to use the patches for some reason, they do not have to. I have several games that I have lost interest in or simply moved on past because the developers went for the “big patch”, probably to appease the MP crowd over numerous changes that made save games incompatible. There are a lot of plusses to frequent patches and, to my mind, few minuses.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Thy Reaper
Mod Designer

Two problems with that

Soumis par Thy Reaper le Sam, 2006-11-18 09:41

There are two problems with small, fast patches over slower, bigger ones.

1) Each patch has a decent chance of breaking something, and occasionally it's a major problem. By not continuously releasing small patches, the chance that something is fatally broken can be reduced, since an extra day of testing by the beta testers will likely occur.

2) There are plenty of people who bought it as a Steam download. The main drawback of steam is that you don't get to choose what version to play, so there is no way to avoid a small patch that ruins the game for a few days until the next patch.

-----
Give me atmopshperic manipulation cannons, or give me death!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Rilbur

Multi-party treaties

Soumis par Rilbur le Sam, 2006-11-18 11:26

Aliances kinda-sorta fulfill those, but maybe the "eridani edict" kinda stuff should be moved into some kind of multi-party treaty that persists through wars... i. e. the geneva conventions...

There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de matryx
Mod Designer

Nice idea, but impractical

Soumis par matryx le Sam, 2006-11-18 13:35

Not only that, the time taken to compile the current build into a distributable patch format would be better spent fixing bugs Eye-wink Patch is due out in just a few days so just hold your breath and count to 10 while you wait!
______________________________________________________
I think I just had an evilgasm.....
The (now official?) Space Empires 4 Mod Launcher V2.26

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Research By Percentage SUCKS
  • Is the Patch Process Dead, and Other Thoughts...
  • Known SE5 v1.74 Bugs
  • Babylon 5 Wars SEV Mod Update
  • Space Empires V 1.74

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • bug in SocietyTypes.txt
  • supply production during combat? possible?
  • This is ridiculous
  • Fighter Groups not Attacking v. 1.44
  • Please make this a better game: A list of 1.08 bugs + feature requests not in 1.13 patch
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.