Accueil Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

Connexion utilisateur

  • Créer un nouveau compte
  • Demander un nouveau mot de passe

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • agrégateur de nouvelles

Rechercher

Qui est en ligne

Il y a actuellement 1 utilisateur et 157 invités en ligne.

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Parcourir les archives

« Septembre 2008  
Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Accueil » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V General

Fleets won't attack planets

Soumis par Shakerfish le Ven, 2006-11-10 11:24 Space Empires V General

Does anyone know why my fleets won’t attack enemy planets? They have planet bombs, supplies and ordinance. We are at war so we have no treaty. My fleets will attack other fleets and fleets in orbit around an enemy planet, but when ordered to attack a planet they just run away and exit the battle zone. Is there some element of research I need to do? I’ve installed the 1.13 patch.

Thanks

‹ Balance Mod Question SE:V Changelog v1.53 ›
» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Got the answer on other post.

Soumis par Shakerfish le Ven, 2006-11-10 11:40

I didn’t know that setting a “no bombardment” treaty with another race meant you couldn’t bomb enemy races either. Doesn't make sense to me but... OK.

Thanks for your help.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Useless Treaty...

Soumis par Shakerfish le Ven, 2006-11-10 11:58

This seems hokey to me. If you have a treaty with another race not to bombard planets this works fine so they won’t attack your planets, but if your at war with another race who does not have a bombardment treaty with any race they can still bomb your planets?

I think they should rethink this type of treaty and have it so that if you have a treaty with another race not to bomb each other planets you can still bomb planets of a race you are at war with.

With the current programming of the game I find the “No Bombardment” treaty useless to me. Suggestions anyone???

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Captain Kwok
Mod Designer

"No Bombardment" conditions under revision

Soumis par Captain Kwok le Ven, 2006-11-10 12:11

The functionality of the "No Bombardment treaty" is actively being addressed in the next patch. This will include fixing the described situation.

-----

Space Empires Depot | Space Food Empires!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Rilbur

An example only....

Soumis par Rilbur le Ven, 2006-11-10 12:24

I think of the "no bombardment" treaties as being along the lines of real life treaties forbidding the use of "weapons of mass destruction". The US might sign those with only a few nations, but they bind us from turning any little backwater into glass simply because we feel like it (afganistan, for example...).

There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Shrike
Mod Designer

Ignorance is bliss??

Soumis par Shrike le Ven, 2006-11-10 19:39

Rilbur wrote:
I think of the "no bombardment" treaties as being along the lines of real life treaties forbidding the use of "weapons of mass destruction". The US might sign those with only a few nations, but they bind us from turning any little backwater into glass simply because we feel like it (afganistan, for example...).

There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

[off-topic]Man, are you really that naive??? Since when has the USA (especially under Bushwacker) felt bound by anything? It would be funny if it wasn't so tragicomic. You should feel really good about not glassing Afghanistan ... go have a look over there and tell them how lucky they are. I recommend you watch "Wag the dog" some time, it's scary how real life mimics parody these days and you are apparently living it eyes wide shut.[/off-topic]

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

No politics please....

Soumis par Robert le Ven, 2006-11-10 20:44

Shrike wrote:
Man, are you really that naive???

A lot of cranky folks around today.

We'll be safer without politics here.

(especially with foolish viewpoints.)

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de Rilbur

Gah

Soumis par Rilbur le Ven, 2006-11-10 22:48

Shrike wrote:
Rilbur wrote:
I think of the "no bombardment" treaties as being along the lines of real life treaties forbidding the use of "weapons of mass destruction". The US might sign those with only a few nations, but they bind us from turning any little backwater into glass simply because we feel like it (afganistan, for example...).

There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

[off-topic]Man, are you really that naive??? Since when has the USA (especially under Bushwacker) felt bound by anything? It would be funny if it wasn't so tragicomic. You should feel really good about not glassing Afghanistan ... go have a look over there and tell them how lucky they are. I recommend you watch "Wag the dog" some time, it's scary how real life mimics parody these days and you are apparently living it eyes wide shut.[/off-topic]

That was theory-craft "this is the idea" not real world politics. Shoulda stated that upfront like I did in the other thread where I used a similar example.

There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Re: Ignorance is bliss??

Soumis par Astroshak le Dim, 2007-09-16 12:27

Shrike wrote:
Rilbur wrote:
I think of the "no bombardment" treaties as being along the lines of real life treaties forbidding the use of "weapons of mass destruction". The US might sign those with only a few nations, but they bind us from turning any little backwater into glass simply because we feel like it (afganistan, for example...).

There are 10 types of people in the world:

Those that understand binary, and those that don't.

[off-topic]Man, are you really that naive??? Since when has the USA (especially under Bushwacker) felt bound by anything? It would be funny if it wasn't so tragicomic. You should feel really good about not glassing Afghanistan ... go have a look over there and tell them how lucky they are. I recommend you watch "Wag the dog" some time, it's scary how real life mimics parody these days and you are apparently living it eyes wide shut.[/off-topic]

Dude, chill. You might not like Bush, someone else might love him ... but if you want an example of where Bush is complying with a treaty, and Clinton did not, consider the program allowing Mexican truckers to drive anywhere in the US now. NAFTA stipulated this, Clinton ignored this element of the treaty, but some panel told Bush he had to comply, and guess what, against the wishes of many Americans, he's complying. By the vitriol you have against Bush, one can only conclude that you're a liberal Democrat - most if not all of whom loved Clinton.

Respect the office even if you cannot respect the man. If you voted for PersonA, and PersonB gets elected, guess what - you elected PersonB by virtue of participating. And if you didn't participate, then you have no right to complain about the elected at all.

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Image de groovyfishguy

Re: Ignorance is bliss??

Soumis par groovyfishguy le Jeu, 2007-09-20 16:48

Democrtas and Republicans blah they all must be assimilated and their uniqueness will become our own....

Groovy Baby Yeah!

» Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Contenu populaire

Aujourd'hui :

  • Space Empires V 1.74
  • Space Empires V
  • Star Fury Modder
  • Ur-Quan Hierarchy Shipset
  • Babylon 5 Wars SEV Mod Update

Depuis toujours :

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Dernier accès :

  • I (still) want more spaceyards
  • EvilMod AI
  • Blockade
  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Remove old CD Key code
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.