SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog |

Wow, Aaron's really on the ball this week... 
I also reported a bug causing combat replays to appear in simultaneous games when ships trigger a minefield, but he didn't get the savegame I sent him in time to get a fix into this patch...
/me especially likes #6 - shipset designers no longer need to worry about firing arcs unless they REALLY want their ships to look "perfect", and shipset can no longer be "handicapped" by not giving them a full set of arcs without explicitly specifying in a mod that they are not to get the full 360 degree firing arc! 
Version 1.74:
1. Fixed - AI script for purchasing initial technology would sometimes repurchase existing levels.
2. Fixed - "Sys_AI_Setup_Get_Research_Points_Remaining" was returning an incorrect value.
3. Fixed - "Sys_AI_Setup_Select_Tech_Area" was returning false incorrectly at times.
4. Fixed - In a no intelligence game, the AI would still build Intelligence facilities.
5. Fixed - Sometimes the processing of a game turn could result in an unloadable game file.
6. Added - "All Shipsets Get 360 Degree Center Firing Point" to Settings.txt. This field adds an
additional firing point to all shipsets that is directly in the center of the ship and
fires in a 360 degree arc. This field is mainly used for shipsets that don't have a complete
firing field for their ships.
7. Fixed - The expected benefits for a tech level would sometimes not show all items.
8. Changed - Decreased damage per level increase for smaller weapons.
9. Fixed - In Simultaneous games, changes made to a planet would not be included in the orders file if
the player made the changes, saved the game, and reloaded the game before ending their turn.
10. Fixed - May have fixed the duplicating design problem during simultaneous games.
11. Fixed - Long text strings without spaces would sometimes not be displayed in message boxes.
12. Fixed - Sometimes the combat replay log file would get junk in it.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I'm happy and confused about No 8. Is Aaron doing balancing work on the stock game or are we supposed to do that?
If he does then he has to fix a gazillion *known* things and problems in the stock game.
If he doesn't then why waste time on it?
?
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Aaron will make balance changes if something is extremely out of whack, but he generally does not do much fine-tuning after the game is released.

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Ha, RESPECT for what he's doing now! These are all very welcome fixes. Just a question regarding mods:
8. Changed - Decreased damage per level increase for smaller weapons.
I would hope this does not affect mods but just the stock game?
----------
See my PBW game stories on http://users.pandora.be/banzaiboy/sevpbw/.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
He is sleeping some time, isn't he?
If not, good for us, too.
@ Shrike: It will not, as long as the mod has its one components.txt (which almost all will have).
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
no 8 may let me use ships more then fighters.
I hope I can get this update soon!

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
As Fyron said, Aaron focuses on major things, but if you can point out specific imbalances, and back up your argument as to how things are imbalanced, he's likely to take some time to correct it.
In the 1.30 era, I think I convinced him to do the first weapon rebalancing, which brought weapons much more inline with each other. I followed that up recently, by describing how different the damage density (dmg/kT) was between small and large weapons - for some things, it was up to 8x greater for the small weapons.
So if you can take the time to show the actual imbalances, and suggest a fix that's not too outrageous, it might get done.
-----
A project a day keeps the deadline away.

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
It seems to me that is no possible to bombard or capture a planet if you have flagged the rule "No bombard planet allowed" with any race!.
Example If I'm at war with the phong I can't capture any planet of them if I have a treat with Eris conf with "No Bombard planet".
I think If I'm at war with a race everything shuld be possible.
Do you?
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I think you can capture a planets but not bombard planets if you have that "No bombard planet allowed" with any empire.

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I'd like to know, is Long Range Engage Distance "fixed"? Or no more hit-and-run tactics for us? If this is the case, seekers probably should be rebalanced in most of the mods...
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Anyone know when this patch might be released? I have a whole fleet of ships that I can't unmothball in the middle of my game. I don't really want to start over. Or alternately, is there some trick or save hack I can do to get them unmothballed?

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
You could try suscribing as a beta-tester...
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
The odds are good that this patch will probably break your current saved games. (based on the fact that most patches have broken the saved games)
If you have a treaty with ANY race that you agree NOT to do something (bombard, viral etc.) then you cannot use those tactics against ANY race, until you break that treaty.

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Actually, most patches don't break saved games. So far, there's no changes in the beta that would effect saved games from v1.71 etc.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
So, no estimates on the patch release date? Anyway, to force my fleet to unmothball besides the command itself? Can I alter some data in the save game file?
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
you may unmothball your ships IF you can go back to 1.66, but I don't know if you can go back from 1.71.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Since the small weapons got changed (good thing IMO), I'd like to ask what is peoples opinion about mine warheads: IMO the problem is that the damage increase is too small compared to the cost increase (for standard mine warheads, special damages are different.) This added to the ease of sweeping mines makes the cheapest mines most effective (though the 100 mine limit is making mines quite useless in general).
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
To me, mines are like barbed wire, they're not there to win the war, or hold the border, but just another obsticle to deal with. I always in clude 2 to 3 dif type satelites in my mine fields just for the sweepers and a few fighters (if i can afford them) just for fun. I want the enemy to know...i know he's there and if i get a ship or 2 along the way....good, i hope it hurt, and think of what u have to look forward to when u meet my fleets. I honestly dont worry too much about mine size becuase i use them as warning bells mostly with a little kick to go with them. But with out some satellites to help protect the field, then to me, they're pretty uselessly swept away, and then what would be the point.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
yeah sweepers need to be rebalanced. being able to safely annihilate the biggest most powerful minefields possible with one ship? barf!!!!!
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I wasn't able to load my game in 1.66 so I just built a whole new fleet and scrapped the mothballed one for resources.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Firing arcs? What firing arcs? Did I miss something? O_o

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
All ship models have firing arcs for weapons animation purposes - ie beams don't cut through ships etc. Some custom sets did not have 360° coverage, so they wouldn't be able to fire weapons in some circumstances. The recent fix is to add a "central" firing point that can cover any direction as a backup.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Oh... so that is just a visual fix, sort of... what a shame, I thought that firing arcs were actually implemented in one of the latest beta patches... *sigh*
Ok, I'm going back lurking 

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
BTW, where is the setting for maximum number of mines in a sector? I didn't find it in Settings.txt ...
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I don't see what the big complaint is over maximum number of mines. It was the same in SEIV. This isn't a new thing, it was always intended, just never implemented.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Problem is that the limit is too low and artificialcompared to minesweepers efficiency. 3 high level minesweepers will clear 100 mines. It seems to me that the mine limit is a left over. We now have the "max units in space" limit we can change when we set up the game. I'd prefer the stock to have very high limits for individual unit types, and rely on the max unit number instead.
Also, can someone explain why mines, satellites and drones are limited to 100 pcs, and fighters to 100 000 pcs?
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
The problem is not the sector mine limit, it is in the sweepers.
2 + (([%Level%] - 1) * 5)
That's a bloody ridiculous formula for the mine sweepers... should be more like:
1 + ([%Level%] / 2)
But as we all know, the stock data set is filled with such insanities, and there isn't much that can be done about it at this point... gotta survive on a strict regimen of mods. BM's is pretty crazy at 5-10 per comp as well, but at least its not 42!
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
YEah... that makes mines almost a waste of time. 
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I've been complaining about #4 to whomever will listen since the beginning. Its about freaking time! 
If 1.74 won't break save games then it will also be safe for PBW games in progress? 

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog

I have to take back what I said about long range being completely broken : It's not COMPLETELY broken, you just have to have a ship that has a longer range and faster than before - +1 speed and +20 range compared to the second ship is not enough anymore. Maybe it's a good thing for balance finally?
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
From the AI point of view humans always cheat shamelessly. 
As for the 2008 election the black man and the woman are in the same party. Democrats as a whole like to appear progressive but are rarely serious about winning. When it comes down to the general election people will rather vote for the geezer in the other party. Democrats since FDR that won did it not because they were liked but because their opponent was disliked. Guess I'm a cynic. I could be wrong but when it comes to politics nobody is right all the time. 
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
8. Changed - Decreased damage per level increase for smaller weapons.
this is good, but i prefer more powerful Emissive Armor.
I hope Small Rocket Pods demage was not changed.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I hope not. Small rocket pods was one of the worst ones. HALVED damage would still be good for it.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
#9 - woohoo! (I sent that one in with saves about a month ago) Perhaps with the next release we can take our turns in monster PBW games over multiple sessions, instead of needing to block off 2-3 hours.

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Actuall, I don't remember to have this problem. I did one of my latest turns in 6 times.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I once submitted a turn that was ignored and the AI took over for me. Perhaps #9 will fix this. 
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Is there a release date for this patch? Or somewhere i can track the progress?

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
The patch is out on steam first for a change it seems!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Join PBW Emperor Of The Universe League Today. Follow the Link to EOTU
http://thewelloftakahlah.spaces.live.com/blog/
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Will it break save games?
Compatible with Balance Mod 1.14?

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
It's at http://www.malfador.com/

Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
I'm not sure if BM v1.14a works correctly with the v1.74 patch. I'll try and post a BM v1.14b later this evening.
Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
Patch already realised download at malfador


Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
And here's the link:
http://www.spaceempires5.com/files/se5patch_v174.exe





Re: SE5 Beta 1.74 Changelog
My most recent game was killed by something, hopefully #5 fixes it (since it wasn't the other problem from another beta log).
Yay for 6, I can finally use the klingon set without fear of being destroyed while fleeing.
Hopefully #8 helps balance fighters out a bit.
-----
A project a day keeps the deadline away.