Home Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • news aggregator

Search

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 171 guests online.

Online users

  • Raapys
  • Firzen_Zero

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Browse archives

« July 2008  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Home » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V Multiplayer

3-4 Players Wanted for PBEM Game

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Wed, 2006-12-06 16:41. Space Empires V Multiplayer

I would like to go ahead and get into an MP game. I can host it, or someone else can host it. Matters not to me. Version is 1.17 stock.

What I would like to do is play with 3-4 guys who can commit to doing one turn in the morning, Eastern US time, and one turn in the evening. Say that we will all turn in a turn by 8 AM Eastern US time, then turn in the second turn by 10 PM Eastern US time. In addition, perhaps on one or more weeknights per week we could all chat on AIM or something and play for a couple of hours to get a few turns in.

If you are interested and can meet those parameters, post here and maybe we can get something going.

‹ 1.17 PBW bug with custom shipsets SE5 on PBW: Finding games ›
» login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mod Designer

That doesn't sound like a

Submitted by carlosjuero on Wed, 2006-12-06 16:58.

That doesn't sound like a bad idea. I work 9am to 6pm eastern so that is plenty of time, and I wouldn't mind putting my meager skills against human opponents.

I don't much use AIM or any IM client anymore, but I do have user id's on most of them so that shouldn't be much of a problem either.

Count me as interested.

-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

» login or register to post comments
Thy Reaper's picture
Mod Designer

I'd like to join in

Submitted by Thy Reaper on Wed, 2006-12-06 17:57.

I haven't played against other people yet, but I'd certainly like to try out my skills, so I'd like to join in.

-----
Give me atmopshperic manipulation cannons, or give me death!

» login or register to post comments

Great! Welcome, Gentlemen

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Wed, 2006-12-06 22:51.

We could probably have a nice game with the three of us, but let's see if one or two more will join in. Perhaps PM me your email address, and let's start talking about settings.

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

Ok, I PM'd you my

Submitted by carlosjuero on Thu, 2006-12-07 05:56.

Ok, I PM'd you my Email.

Hopefully we can get at least one more person Smiling

Now I guess it would indeed be a good time to talk about settings and procedure. I just hope I don't have an odd crash when I try to save my empire file (it has happened before, but I think it was a fluke).

I use custom Design Types (DesignTypes.txt) with my games normally, maybe we should come up with some common design types? Seeing as how there is no way to dynamically add them to an empire during play, only the default file can be changed at this point (after the game is created and the first session saved, the designtypes file can be reverted to the default). The design types are saved with the Save Game rather than the empire file unfortunately - so any types would have to be global to the game [the AI can change them at will it seems though].

-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

» login or register to post comments

rules?

Submitted by Arius32 on Thu, 2006-12-07 06:49.

well, multiplayer sure beats the pathetic AI, so count me in .. but, what are you playing? stock? and who do i need to contact, and how do i send an empire file to who?

» login or register to post comments

Good

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Thu, 2006-12-07 07:42.

We'll play stock. As for design types, I really don't know what you're talking about. I'm open to anything.

I've got emails from carlos and arius. Once I hear from Reaper and arius confirms he can meet the times, we can get started. Does someone want to host? If not, I will. Post any preferences for galaxy settings. I like cluster and large. Should we put some computer players in? And what about colonize only own type?

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

Design Types are the type

Submitted by carlosjuero on Thu, 2006-12-07 08:06.

Design Types are the type you set when creating the ship, i.e. 'Attack Ship', 'Defense Ship', etc. The stock types are kind of limited (In my opinion at least) as I like to categorize by more specific types (Scout, Fast Attack, etc).

Large cluster sounds good, and maybe a few AI players would add some spice to the game (that way we can ally with each other or the AI and have some interesting encounters).

I don't personally like 'Colonize own type' - this reduces reasons to take over enemy home worlds Smiling and takes some conflict value away (This is my opinion, I will play no matter what).

I think we should make the Racial points only around 2K, how do you all feel about limiting specialty techs? (Like Organic, Crystallurgy, Religion, etc).

OBviously no cheat codes allowed Sticking out tongue.

Also for Galaxy Type - maybe turn off 'All Warp Points Connected'? this will allow a random chance for isolated empires making a stunning entrance Smiling

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments
RogerN's picture

Why PBEM?

Submitted by RogerN on Thu, 2006-12-07 08:57.

Why not host this game on seiv.pbw.cc? It ought to handle the turn frequency you want, as long as everyone is consistent about submitting their turns. At the very least you'd save the poor host a lot of tedium.

» login or register to post comments

Looking to play

Submitted by crward on Thu, 2006-12-07 09:25.

I'd be up for a game as well... So far the PBW seems to work well, so I'd second that idea.

» login or register to post comments

players?

Submitted by Arius32 on Thu, 2006-12-07 09:52.

so there's six of us now?

i'd go for "colonizing own type" , i'd also go for no intel, standard quadrent? medium?
we are playing stock right?

info GMT+2 here..

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

I´d like to join, if it´s possible.

Submitted by Grendel on Thu, 2006-12-07 14:32.

same.

» login or register to post comments

PBW

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Thu, 2006-12-07 15:01.

I don't mind trying it, but I went to that site and couldn't figure out how it is supposed to work. I searched for games and all I saw were SEIV ganes. I don't mind doing the work to host PBEM. It can be systematized pretty easily.

OK, I have email addresses from carlos and arius. I just need a PM from each of the others with your email address so I can start coordinating. Shoot me a PM and anybody who PMs me within the next 24 hours will be in the game.

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

How about we work out the

Submitted by carlosjuero on Thu, 2006-12-07 15:40.

How about we work out the final rules and settings now? It is nice that we have such a large amount of interest Smiling. This should be fun! I, of course, expect to get creamed early on but it will be very fun to play against someone who can do intelligent attacks and ship designs.

I don't know about 'No Intel', it can be alot of fun to use intel attacks against the enemy, but I would be fine if we decide to turn it off [one less facility type I have to build :)]

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments

Intel

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Thu, 2006-12-07 16:09.

I probably would prefer no intel, but will play with intel if everybody else wants to. My problem with intel is how powerful it is. A spy kills 271 million people by poisoning food? That's like some spy poisoning the entire population of the United States. It's absurd. SO I am on board with a no intel rule.

No cheat codes, obviously.

We can allow all colonization, that's ok. I think it would make more sense if colonizing a strange type weren't the same as colonizing your own type, but I can go with it.

Limiting racial techs is absolutely ok with me. What do you have in mind?

Also, how about no ancient race?

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

For limiting racial techs I

Submitted by carlosjuero on Thu, 2006-12-07 16:18.

For limiting racial techs I was thinking that we would not allow any of those special ones, like Organic, Temporal, etc (the techs that can be picked during empire creation). At least for a first game, so it could be basic types against basic types. Other Racial Traits would be fine (Advanced Propulsion, Storage Expert, etc) - this is why I suggest setting the racial points for new players to 2000 - it allows for diversity in our empires (ya have to make some trade offs if you want one type of trait over another).

Definitely no 'Ancient Race', no one should be able to see the whole galaxy at start.

I didn't think about how wonky the intel is, so I am onboard with no intel as well. As for colonizing own types, I will go with the majority - it will be interesting either way we do it.

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments

PBW

Submitted by crward on Thu, 2006-12-07 19:29.

I'll set up a game on PBW if you want... otherwise, it's not too hard: go via the text page from seiv.pbw.cc
log in
go to games
select create game
Select one of the appropriate versions for create game (there are 4 versions of SE5

Name it, and fill out the rest of the screen -- Probably name it SE5.

We send in .emp files conforming to your requirements... and we're off.

» login or register to post comments

Settings

Submitted by crward on Thu, 2006-12-07 20:24.

Hmmm, given my preferences, I'd go with an "anything goes" game with Kwok's balance mod. I'll give my reasons, but I'd be happy to go with stock.

All in all, stock is at its best in Multiplayer, but the problem is if you have neutral/AI empires -- they don't last long enough, and they give a significant advantage to players who find them as neighbors.

I don't mean to argue against anyone, just suggest my experience -- (I've logged a modest amount of time in solitaire multiplayer, so I've gotten some small appreciation for the way humans play against each other -- granted, it's a biased sample, but enough to get some insight.)

Why to like balance mod:
A) Fighters, not Psuedo Fighters 16kt vs 30kt.
B) Ordnance and Supply components count as cargo for freighters
C) No drones to start.
D) Useful PD from the start (with A/I actually using it)
E) Balanced special racials -- e.g. 1500 for organic tech... (a way of achieving what we're trying to achieve without forcing it).
F) You can actually have neutral empires because the A/I gets above speed-bump level. Otherwise the MP is nearly decided by who finds the most digestible neutrals the fastest..

All in all, I think the standard set-up tends to push toward an optimal strategy of Carrier/Drone Borgs: fighters, seekers, and drones are extremely powerful, and A/I is weak, so you go drones, carriers, and fighters to assimilate A/I empires that are weak on point defense. Getting an extra homeworld is a tremendous advantage, nearly doubling Research output, and in standard they are all too easily captured with ground troops, carriers and fighters.

As to intel. I actually rather like it. I'm not convinced that the 240m casualties due to e.Coli is an argument against (if you can fit em into a cargo ship, you can kill them with e.coli!). If we have a lot of players, intel is nice -- and probably more significant -- because it can reveal extant alliances.

I don't particularly like "colonize own type" rules, especially as I suspect this'll put a premium on assimilating the neutral races...

All and all, these are just preferences though I would highly suggest that stock and A/I empires is a recipe for competitive randomness, while stock, A/I, and own type really stacks the deck toward borgs.

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

Weird, I swear I read your

Submitted by carlosjuero on Thu, 2006-12-07 20:48.

Weird, I swear I read your post already, I swear it was marked read... but looking in the Recent Posts I saw one new post in this thread.. and it was yours Shocked - the forum genies are upset for snow is due to fall where I live Sticking out tongue

How about we try a game with stock and then, if we like playing against each other, we can do a balance mod game? (I still haven't installed the Balance Mod.. I should get around to it but I have been playing with stock and working on some of my editor ideas)

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments

Interesting points, crward

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Thu, 2006-12-07 22:13.

I think we'll stick with stock for this game, as carlos suggested, but we can play around with the suggestions from crward.

Given that a new patch appears imminent, we can take our time setting this up. The new patch might be worth waiting for.

» login or register to post comments
Captain Calhoun's picture

Is the game full up yet?

Submitted by Captain Calhoun on Thu, 2006-12-07 22:34.

And is it one turn per day?
----------
Gravity... it's not just a good idea, it's the law!

» login or register to post comments

Confusing Forum Genies

Submitted by crward on Fri, 2006-12-08 07:15.

Heh. Sorry for the confusion. It's probably that I edited it a couple times. Seems it reposts the date stamp with a new edit.

» login or register to post comments

I try... but stock sounds fine.

Submitted by crward on Fri, 2006-12-08 07:17.

Thanks... Stock sounds fine: it'll be nice to get a chance to evaluate it with real players on the other end...

» login or register to post comments

PBW or PBEM?

Submitted by crward on Fri, 2006-12-08 07:24.

Do you want to go with email papa? Or PBW?

» login or register to post comments

I thought I had replied to this earlier today

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Fri, 2006-12-08 15:55.

If you guys think PBW is better and I can figure it out, I am fine with it. I really don't care either way. I've never done MP so I'm open to any suggestions from those who have.

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

Lets make it a vote: A)

Submitted by carlosjuero on Fri, 2006-12-08 16:57.

Lets make it a vote:

A) PBEM
B) PBW
C) No preference

To vote just put the letter you wish in a reply. The majority rules (no preferences go with the majority on A or B)

If we don't want to vote then please let us pick one. I say A - PBEM (no need for registration)

As soon as we get that lets get the game set up so we can have some fun bashing each other in the empty void of space!

I warn you all, I shall not die easily.. well maybe easily but I will do nefarious things on my way out! Laughing out loud

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments

B

Submitted by crward on Fri, 2006-12-08 18:18.

B) PBW...

of course I'm already registered and in a couple games.

I'd be happy to set up.

In fact, I will set it up. If there's an overwhelming outcry we can go PBEM. Otherwise, register, read the PBW FAQ, and submit your empire.

» login or register to post comments

SEVStockLarge at seiv.pbw.cc

Submitted by crward on Fri, 2006-12-08 18:35.

I've opened a game by our description at
seiv.pbw.cc... Register and upload an empire file if you'd like to join. If this seems a problem, we can go with PBEMing to Carlosjuero, but we might as well get moving....

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

C) No preference. I´ve

Submitted by Grendel on Fri, 2006-12-08 21:19.

C) No preference.

I´ve never played multiplayer before, so I don´t have preferences right now.

Pending join in Crward´s PBW game, just in case...

» login or register to post comments

Heading over to pbw to try and figure it out

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Fri, 2006-12-08 22:51.

PBW is fine with me. Crward took the initiative to start it, I'll join in.

» login or register to post comments

OK, I joined

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Fri, 2006-12-08 23:10.

I guess now crward needs to approve me before I can upload the empire file, because I see no way to upload at this moment. My empire file is ready, and I will check again in the morning when I wake up.

» login or register to post comments

That's correct

Submitted by crward on Sat, 2006-12-09 01:59.

You're in. Waiting for you to upload an emp file...

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

I´m ready.

Submitted by Grendel on Sat, 2006-12-09 05:30.

I´m ready.

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

I will get my empire file

Submitted by carlosjuero on Sat, 2006-12-09 07:12.

I will get my empire file loaded up a little later t his morning.

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

I joined - waiting for

Submitted by carlosjuero on Sat, 2006-12-09 08:11.

I joined - waiting for approval so I can upload my empire file

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

I have to upload my empire again

Submitted by Grendel on Sat, 2006-12-09 12:52.

I noticed I made a mistake with my empire, so I have left the game and joined again.

I´ve got the new file ready to upload.

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

My empire is uploaded and

Submitted by carlosjuero on Sat, 2006-12-09 13:42.

My empire is uploaded and waiting Smiling

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments

Game to start tonight

Submitted by crward on Sat, 2006-12-09 14:13.

I'll send out turns this evening, in about 8 hours or so.

Anybody else who wants to join should do so before then.

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

Ready

Submitted by Grendel on Sat, 2006-12-09 15:33.

Empire uploaded and waiting Smiling

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

I´m having some troubles

Submitted by Grendel on Sat, 2006-12-09 18:28.

I´m having some troubles with http://seiv.pbw.cc/

I get a "java error" message. Server problem, or just my problem?

» login or register to post comments

"Java error" in SEiv.pbw.cc-- client-side memory leak?

Submitted by crward on Sat, 2006-12-09 18:39.

I had that problem myself, but it seems to have been client-side.... The error went away after I rebooted

» login or register to post comments

LAST CALL: 6+ Player PBW game

Submitted by crward on Sat, 2006-12-09 18:41.

Kickoff in 3-4 hours.

(Folks who are signed up for the game, will you be around on Saturday PM or Sunday to chain our way through a bunch of the early turns?)

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

ill be

Submitted by carlosjuero on Sat, 2006-12-09 20:13.

ill be around

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

First turn done

Submitted by Grendel on Sat, 2006-12-09 22:02.

First turn done Smiling

» login or register to post comments

On SEVStockLarge PBW game Stay tuned... Sorry...

Submitted by crward on Sat, 2006-12-09 22:20.

I seem to have goofed.... Couldn't add my own empire unless I increased starting tech to 1,000,000. And I discover that I can build Battleships and Baseships as well as frigates...

We can continue with this flawed game, or restart...

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

NP for restarting, turn sent

Submitted by Grendel on Sat, 2006-12-09 22:25.

NP for restarting, turn sent again Sticking out tongue

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

OOps - I just sent my turn

Submitted by carlosjuero on Sat, 2006-12-09 22:33.

OOps - I just sent my turn in (or have we restarted?. I have no problem restarting either.

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments

SEVStockLarge3 Game now started -- restart of previous

Submitted by crward on Sat, 2006-12-09 22:36.

Sorry folks. It looks like one has to start a new game to restart the game. Could you please resubmit your empires?

» login or register to post comments

:-/ Hmm.. SEVStockLarge up and running

Submitted by crward on Sat, 2006-12-09 23:23.

Sorry folks, we're up and running with the old game...

» login or register to post comments

Underway

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Mon, 2006-12-11 05:45.

I tried to post on the pbw forum that crward started but was told I don't have permission to do that.

I am a bit concerned about the settings of this game. Having so many AI players with team mode on and intel allowed concerns me. In my SP with those settings, the instant I contacted an AI, I was in contact with all of them, and they combined their intel against me. It was simply impossible for me to have enough intel points to counter them, and their intel slaughtered all my planets. I'm concerned that the first player to hit the AI is going to get destroyed by the combined AI intel. We were discussing no intel, and the game was simply set up with intel.

The other settings -- three home planets and research costs being so high -- are things I personally don't favor, but I will play through that and give something new a chance. But the number of AI and the intel allowed bother me because it was set up that way somewhat counter to the run of discussion, and endangers the playability of the game. I mean, 13 AI? With a total of 19 empires, you're not going to be able to move without hitting somebody.

» login or register to post comments

Re: Papa Frepoll's "Underway"

Submitted by crward on Mon, 2006-12-11 12:07.

Weird... Sorry about the glitch in your posting rights on the game forum... I'll double-check that. Give it another try.

I made an arbitrary decision on the Intel, in part to get the game running. Now that you mention it, I probably should have gone with your preference, particularly given your reasoning above. It may well be that we all suffer the ignominity of being wiped out by the A/I, and you're right, the game may be decided by who gets Intel-nuked first.

The game's four turns old; I'd be perfectly happy to restart or join a game that you start.

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

I think that we can carry on

Submitted by Grendel on Mon, 2006-12-11 13:47.

I think that we can carry on a bit. Balance Mod V1.0 is avaliable now, and I think that we will have a new retail patch soon.

Have in mind that we are using a version that still has some issues. We may find unexpected troubles in the later game that will not appear in newer versions of the game.

If the game becomes unplayable, we will be able to restart with a new and better version, with fewer bugs and more advanced AI.

» login or register to post comments

Onward

Submitted by crward on Mon, 2006-12-11 13:58.

That's my sense as well: I'd tend to think we're playing in part to expose issues that might not otherwise come up. I'm curious to hear, for example, whether the unlucky first player does indeed get Intel-nuked.

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

'twill be fun

Submitted by carlosjuero on Mon, 2006-12-11 19:58.

'twill be fun Laughing out loud

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments

Onward SE soldiers

Submitted by Papa Frepoll on Mon, 2006-12-11 20:46.

Onward and upward, then. We are off, gentlemen. May we achieve exit velocity.

» login or register to post comments
Mod Designer

I think we just met with

Submitted by carlosjuero on Tue, 2006-12-12 17:37.

I think we just met with Newtons laws... the PBW website isn't loading for me :/ (hopefully the email submission worked).

---------------------------
-Currently subjecting multiple galaxies to the doom of conquer or blackholes

Designt Type Editor for SE:V

» login or register to post comments
Grendel's picture

same with me...

Submitted by Grendel on Tue, 2006-12-12 17:55.

same with me...

» login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Popular content

Today's:

  • Tweaking the planet art without going all the way to FQM
  • Space Empires V 1.74
  • Research By Percentage SUCKS
  • Babylon 5 Vorlon ship set
  • Star Wars SEV ship set available

All time:

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Last viewed:

  • Flat cost curve mod
  • Ground Combat Mod 2.13
  • Tweaking the planet art without going all the way to FQM
  • Interesting AI discoveries... Part1 + Part 2
  • Supply Magic!
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.