Home Crush your enemies... and create an EMPIRE!!! Space Empires V -- BUY NOW!!!

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Navigation

  • news
    • archive
    • blogs
    • books
    • forums
    • recent posts
    • groups
  • image galleries
  • projects & downloads
  • search
  • create content
  • news aggregator

Search

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 149 guests online.

Online users

  • Twad
  • bladeer
  • Caius

Languages

  • English English
  • French French

Browse archives

« May 2008  
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Home » news » forums » Space Empires V » Space Empires V General

Sollar Collector vs Quantum Reactor

Submitted by iseng on Fri, 2006-12-01 23:58. Space Empires V General

Is it just me or has Quantum Reactor become entirely useless?

Why would anyone wants to spend precious research points on 20 levels of Resupply for this component? When we can get Solar Collector by researching Sollar Harnessing. Solar Sail is a nice bonus too.

Here's a quick spreadsheets I did. Using stock data and Balanced Mod. In both, Quantum Reactor efficiency falls short to Solar Collector. Almost 2-to-1. Shocked

Stock

Balanced Mod

Research (Balanced Mod)

edit:
maximum levels corrected.
supply/cost corrected.
research ladder added.

‹ Finding Random Research Mod No combat in obscuring storms - but I can see enemy ships? ›
» login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Captain Kwok's picture
Mod Designer

Balance Mod Data Not Correct...

Submitted by Captain Kwok on Sat, 2006-12-02 00:10.

There are only 6 levels of Solar Collector in the Balance Mod. It gives 50-100 supplies/star at a size of 20kT each.

The Quantum Reactor is 20kT with 11 levels and ranges from 100-200 supplies and is not star dependent.

The costs are a little bit out of line though - QRs should probably be 1.5x greater in cost over SCs rather than 3x.

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» login or register to post comments
Captain Kwok's picture
Mod Designer

A couple of other items...

Submitted by Captain Kwok on Sat, 2006-12-02 00:25.

Also your supply/cost column is not correct. You need to add the two resource costs together and then divide by supply. Alternatively you can represent is as cost/supply which might be a friendlier stat.

Another thing to consider is that the QR (at least in BM) is pulling down 2x the supply in the same space, so you'd expect to be paying more for sophisticated tech. More importantly is that the cost/supply is decreasing with tech level within each component.

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» login or register to post comments

Thanks, I've made some

Submitted by iseng on Sat, 2006-12-02 01:28.

Thanks, I've made some corrections. And added the research costs for comparison.

I won't analyse stock data any further. The difference is so apparent. Sticking out tongue So let's focus on Balanced Mod now.

Supply for Space
This is where Quantum Reactor is better than Solar Collector.

For the same space, the break-even point (both producing 100 supplies) is at level 6 for Sollar Collector and level 1 for Quantum Reactor.

Research Cost
To get Quantum Reactor (at level 1) we have to research 11 levels of Resupply. Which costs 990,000 cumulatively.

With the same research points, we can have Stellar Harnessing at level 6 (the maximum for Solar Reactor) plus 570,000 unused research points that can be applied to other tech areas.

So with 990,0000 RP:
Quantum Reactor level 1
Solar Collector level 6 + 570,000 RP

Material Cost
Tit-for-tat, Solar Collector at any level -- except level 1 -- has better supply/cost ratio than any level of Quantum Reactor.

Quantum Reactor is only attractive if you don't care about research cost & time and if you have lots and lots of materials (minerals and radioactives). Which only happens at the end of the game where you almost win. With or without Quantum Reactor, it won't make any difference.

Personally if I have lots of materials I would still choose Solar Collector. For the same material costs I can have 3 Solar Collector level 6 for every 1 of Quantum Reactor level 11. That's 300 supplies (3x100) instead of 200 supplies.

» login or register to post comments

They are of most use in

Submitted by spacedragon on Sat, 2006-12-02 04:48.

They are of most use in ancient galaxies when you have to travel through blackhole after blackhole after nebula to reach your next star system; Solar Collectors don't help much there.

» login or register to post comments
cordas's picture

I would think an easy way to

Submitted by cordas on Sat, 2006-12-02 05:56.

I would think an easy way to make QR worth the effort would be if they could also generate ordanance as well as supplies.... The inability for anyone other than Organics to regen ord is a pain.

» login or register to post comments
Captain Kwok's picture
Mod Designer

More to resupply than meets the eye... :P

Submitted by Captain Kwok on Sat, 2006-12-02 10:04.

Another factor to consider is that the Resupply research provides more than just the Quantum Reactor in the Balance Mod. It also goes towards Resupply Depots, plus Supply and Ordnance Storage components. So you're researching it anyway.

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» login or register to post comments
cordas's picture

That doesn't help those of

Submitted by cordas on Sat, 2006-12-02 10:06.

That doesn't help those of us who like the stock game Kwok. I just wish that bit of technology consolidation would could be moved into the stock game.

» login or register to post comments
Captain Kwok's picture
Mod Designer

Clarification

Submitted by Captain Kwok on Sat, 2006-12-02 11:17.

Just to clarify since it seems like today is going to be a gang up on Kwok day is that a) I didn't start this thread; b) I only responded to a direct question about the mod; and c) I didn't say let's focus on the balance mod only...

So my answers were directed at iseng and his comments about research costs.

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» login or register to post comments
cordas's picture

I ain't having a dig at you

Submitted by cordas on Sat, 2006-12-02 13:00.

I ain't having a dig at you Kwok. I personally wish some of your things from the balance mod where incorperated into stock, as i have said before and will carry on saying untill the stock is changed Eye-wink I really like how you have consolidated some of the techs as they make far more sense.

» login or register to post comments

spacedragon, Very good

Submitted by iseng on Sun, 2006-12-03 00:24.

spacedragon,
Very good point. I forgot about it.

Yes, the more star in a system the better Solar Collector is. But, if there's no star then it's useless.

Captain Kwok,
No one is out for your blood. Yet. Smiling We're just having a discussion here.

To be honest, I have just downloaded your mod and haven't play it yet. Actually the reason I wanted to play your mod is because of my frustration with stock data. One of them is, as you can guess, Quantum Reactor inefficiency.

» login or register to post comments

Balance Mod

Submitted by crward on Sun, 2006-12-03 12:34.

Just for what it's worth, I was reluctant to try the balance mod, partially because I liked the longer tech trees of stock, and partially because I figured stock had been tested to perfection...

Anyway, I've given the mod a try, and like it so far -- my first multiplayer looks like it will be using balance, so I've been trying to get used to the differences from stock.

In general, I like the fact that balance deemphasizes the insignificant choices in the tech tree in favor of the more significant ones. This is good -- choice is good, as some other posters have noted, but red herring choices are not.

» login or register to post comments
Ashbery76's picture
Mod Designer

heh

Submitted by Ashbery76 on Sun, 2006-12-03 12:45.

crward wrote:
and partially because I figured stock had been tested to perfection...

I fell of my chair laughing at that statement.

» login or register to post comments

:-)

Submitted by crward on Sun, 2006-12-03 12:51.

Smiling

» login or register to post comments

Or you can do what I

Submitted by Avatar on Sun, 2006-12-03 12:56.

Or you can do what I do...

Save the space from using Supply Storage... Your ship will have 40-60k supplies and you don't need to worry.. more than enough for a while

» login or register to post comments
herr_phil's picture

Bang/Buck

Submitted by herr_phil on Sun, 2006-12-03 20:31.

The reason I use quantum reactors more often than I do solar collectors is that I need the space. A maxed out QR gives you 1.5x more supply for 20kt than does the solar collectors at 20kt. That effect can be changed in a system with multiple stars, but statistically you have as many of those as you have star-less systems. So in the long run, assuming your resources are in good shape, you can use the extra room on board to place more weapons, or some armour you didn't put on yet.

"Light travels faster than sound, that's why people seem bright until you hear them."

» login or register to post comments

Quantum Reactor = Crap

Submitted by Fishman on Sun, 2006-12-03 23:23.

The SEV QR is crap. You get 100-290 supplies per turn at the cost of 20kt space. Your engines chew down between 32 and 48 supply a move, so you're going to eat down 520-720 supply a turn, for 8-12 engines. If you're like me, you're flying 12 engines on a cruiser (anything else is TOO SLOW). So 1 max QR will reduce your supply usage from 720 to 430. QE10s hold 2000 supply apiece, so a QR would give you an operational life of 55 turns. Assuming no weapons fire or cloaking. This is not a very useful voyage, but eh.

In contrast, a 10kt ERS pod will give 47 turns of operational life (+10K supply @ 720/t) just on its own, and give you indefinite deep space operation if your force has repair capability, which you'd want to have if you were planning to do any fighting anyway. Assuming your fleet has repair capability, you can pack both unlimited ammo AND unlimited supply, and you will probably spend LESS than 1 ERS + ERO pod per ship, as a whole pod is not necessary to refill the tankage of one ship, and the pod will be rebuilt every turn.

» login or register to post comments
cordas's picture

Hmmm never thougt about that

Submitted by cordas on Mon, 2006-12-04 03:26.

Hmmm never thougt about that appeoach Fishman, using the emergenct supply pods and repair... rather cheesy but if it works it works Smiling

» login or register to post comments

Well...

Submitted by Fishman on Mon, 2006-12-04 04:47.

Well, it wasn't necessary back when QRs in SEIV actually fulfilled their promise of providing freedom from resupply. Now they don't actually keep you supplied, so they're pretty useless. Maybe if they didn't cap out at such a low level, but 290 supply a turn doesn't really make a difference. If they also *STORED* a lot of supplies, that might work, but they do neither, so you're better off putting ERS pods on a few ships and doling out the supplies from them, while using the obligatory repair craft you need in your force anyway.

I never understood why they were "emergency" pods anyway, it's never an actual emergency. Or maybe it's always an emergency. For that matter, I've never understood emergency exits, either. Why only use an exit for emergencies, if it's a perfectly good exit in non-emergencies, too?

» login or register to post comments

SE4 QR's

Submitted by Solymr on Mon, 2006-12-04 04:47.

I prefered SE4 QR's personally, took a lot longer to get, but actually proved to be insanely useful. Oh, how I wish for an Endless Supply ability to be added into SE5.

» login or register to post comments

offtopic - emer exits

Submitted by spacedragon on Mon, 2006-12-04 06:41.

Fishman wrote:
For that matter, I've never understood emergency exits, either. Why only use an exit for emergencies, if it's a perfectly good exit in non-emergencies, too?

Because those exits aren't good outside of emergencies. The function of an emergency exit is to empty the commercial building as quickly as possible. The function of a normal exit is to let people leave in a CONTROLLED manner that makes them happy and takes them past your concession stands so they can buy soda and popcorn. And stop them exploring backstage, which you probably are not insured for. You really do not want some customer's kid stumbling into the generator room and blowing the place up. And it costs extra money to use those emergency exits, too. More doors means more security, more corridors to paint (yea, service and emergency access corridors dont have to be decorated or pleasantly lighted) and for example on a plane, more boarding ramps.

» login or register to post comments

iseng wrote:Is it just me or

Submitted by spacedragon on Mon, 2006-12-04 06:44.

iseng wrote:
Is it just me or has Quantum Reactor become entirely useless? Why would anyone wants to spend precious research points on 20 levels of Resupply for this component? When we can get Solar Collector by researching Sollar Harnessing. Solar Sail is a nice bonus too. Here's a quick spreadsheets I did.

How does your SE-V run long enough to get that far into the game without crashing? Smiling Sure you can save each turn, but if the game freezes everytime on processing orders for one turn, you pretty much can't continue.

» login or register to post comments

spacedragon wrote:How does

Submitted by iseng on Mon, 2006-12-04 08:58.

spacedragon wrote:
How does your SE-V run long enough to get that far into the game without crashing? Smiling Sure you can save each turn, but if the game freezes everytime on processing orders for one turn, you pretty much can't continue.
Fortunately 1.17 is pretty stable so far. Smiling Have you installed the patch yet?

» login or register to post comments
cordas's picture

My idea on fixing Quatum Reactors

Submitted by cordas on Mon, 2006-12-04 10:43.

Solymr wrote:
I prefered SE4 QR's personally, took a lot longer to get, but actually proved to be insanely useful. Oh, how I wish for an Endless Supply ability to be added into SE5.

I really liked them as well and miss them, that said I know what they are trying to do by changing them. Its just a shame that they have completely nurfed them in the meantime. I like the idea that they don't give endless supplies, I just feel that give far less than they should and they don't supply ordanance. (Nothing does unless you take Organic tech as far as I can see) then to add insult to injury they are on a lame tech that really isn't worth developing until you are bored, by which time they are pointless anyway.

Change the tech to make QRs come in earlier but at less efficency then ramp them upto where they are supplying at least 1000 per turn. Also add something like a "Matter Scoop" that allows you to generate ordinance on the ship(has no storage facility thou), maybe ramping up to 250 ord per turn (not as good as organic but still nice enough). This would make the whole resuply tech worth exploring.

» login or register to post comments
Captain Kwok's picture
Mod Designer

Quantum Reactor and supplies

Submitted by Captain Kwok on Mon, 2006-12-04 15:19.

IMO, a single quantum reactor should not displace the ship's supply usage for its maximum movement in a turn. It should cover about 50% around max tech level. This works ok because you can pause for a turn or two and restore full supplies rather than always having full supplies, which was a concern with the QR from SE:IV - removing all strategy from supplies in the later game.

-----

Space Empires Depot | SE:V Balance Mod

» login or register to post comments

My current approach (with

Submitted by iseng on Mon, 2006-12-04 20:03.

My current approach (with stock data) is to avoid weapons that require ordnances. Add supply ships to each fleet. Especially for my "expeditionary" fleets.

Will try that ERS/ERO approach later. I was particularly hesitant to use this. Thought it might have been a bug and will be fixed later.

» login or register to post comments

Doubt it's a bug

Submitted by Fishman on Tue, 2006-12-05 02:00.

IIRC, ERS pods tricks have been around since SEIII, so I doubt it's a bug. Of course, you need repair ships anyway, if you're going to do any of the other fun tricks for staying supplied, like piracy. I've done that before, too, when I forgot to include the ERS pod, or because I was burning more supplies a turn than even my ERS pod was capable of supplying at that tech level, I just jack enemy ships, loot them for their supplies and ordnances, and then destroy them.

Of course, you need the repair capability to repair your boarding component, anyway. But it's fun to stay operational purely off piracy and slavery.

» login or register to post comments
cordas's picture

Pirates of Carribean Galaxy

Submitted by cordas on Tue, 2006-12-05 08:42.

Fishman wrote:
But it's fun to stay operational purely off piracy and slavery.

Sounds like FUN will have to give it a try Smiling Gave up on the idea of ship snatching when I found out that Analyze was broken, but this sounds intresting....

» login or register to post comments
Shrike's picture
Mod Designer

Re: Sollar Collector vs Quantum Reactor

Submitted by Shrike on Mon, 2008-04-28 18:15.

Maybe there could be a hull type modded in with an atribute that has it collect some supplies per turn? That would be most fitting for a new racial trait, similar to the crystalline and organic hulls.

Sorry to reanimate this dead thread btw Puzzled
----------
See my PBW game stories on http://users.pandora.be/banzaiboy/sevpbw/.

» login or register to post comments

Re: Sollar Collector vs Quantum Reactor

Submitted by marhawkman on Tue, 2008-04-29 04:45.

Collect or generate? Either would be good I guess. *adds to Wanderer list*

» login or register to post comments
Shrike's picture
Mod Designer

Re: Sollar Collector vs Quantum Reactor

Submitted by Shrike on Tue, 2008-04-29 06:08.

I was thinking about how the cosmic radiation hitting a ship hull might conceivably be transformed into storable energy/supplies. It would be rather moderate, but the bigger the hull, the greater the benefit.

----------
See my PBW game stories on http://users.pandora.be/banzaiboy/sevpbw/.

» login or register to post comments

Re: Sollar Collector vs Quantum Reactor

Submitted by marhawkman on Tue, 2008-04-29 06:55.

Cosmic radiation from what?

Stars? If so, it'd be like having built in solar panels.
Random cosmic bodies? might as well just make it always generate.

Although you could mix the two.

» login or register to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Now on STEAM

Now on STEAM!Space Empires V via STEAMSpace Empires IV via STEAMSTEAM online by Valve Corporation

Popular content

Today's:

  • Defence vs. Attack and other Combat related questions...
  • Sphärenwelt
  • Why Retrofit is limited to +50% per order?
  • Babylon 5 Wars SEV Mod Update
  • Balance Mod Neutral Races

All time:

  • Space Empires V and VI: Expansions and the Future: Tell the Company What's on Your Wish List
  • Space Empires V
  • Gritty Galaxy Fleet Clash
  • Damn Dirty Bugs/Annoyances
  • Space Empires V: General Thoughts, Observations, and Suggestions

Last viewed:

  • Beta Testers
  • Land game Q/patch
  • Balance Mod Neutral Races
  • conquest for the purpose of colonizing different atmospheres.
  • Why Retrofit is limited to +50% per order?
(c) Strategy First, Inc. All rights reserved.